From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40568) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1da6pG-0005RY-10 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jul 2017 16:53:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1da6pC-0002yo-MY for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jul 2017 16:53:05 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:53716) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1da6pC-0002yL-B9 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jul 2017 16:53:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1da6pB-00012R-Q0 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jul 2017 16:53:01 -0400 Subject: [bug#27683] [PATCH] gnu: libjaylink: Update to 699b700. openocd: Update to 0.10.0 Resent-Message-ID: From: Marius Bakke In-Reply-To: <871sp4a56d.fsf@openmailbox.org> References: <20170713095923.4115-1-theodoros.for@openmailbox.org> <20170723001221.GB24840@jasmine.lan> <871sp4a56d.fsf@openmailbox.org> Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 22:52:53 +0200 Message-ID: <87fudkjl22.fsf@fastmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Theodoros Foradis , 27683@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Theodoros Foradis writes: > Hello Leo, > >> Overall the changes look good to me, but can you clarify if they need to >> be applied in the same commit like this? > > I remember reading somewhere (irc or mailing list probably), that a > package should not break between commits (to be able to bisect). That > would be the case with openocd, if libjaylink is updated before openocd. > > If this concern is not valid, I can split the commit in two and resubmit > the patches. There are certain cases where updating together make a lot of sense, such as the gstreamer- or qt-family packages. But for mostly-unrelated programs it's better to have the patches in bite-sized chunks. I agree that they should be updated separately. We often break packages in commits, wittingly or not ;-) --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEu7At3yzq9qgNHeZDoqBt8qM6VPoFAll3r6YACgkQoqBt8qM6 VPrciggAiEbJqsjQ1Rtnx5FzTbNUyKDSG+sLvs5aK7020DlGYdF4cnTtWU9gsJBX xecg8D1okuq5ZzrxDjALmGTz/tYNqMi9FevOGFGlGDwAuEnzFzS57xdLc+RvaKdg DQi9XwZfp85Ao1UgaxdLWIWYjQ8GnzHUN28x0qkuda6gDxc1o44I+a1T2onGQSs8 9w8BE0FscCAiXJnvKdVAL8CQYtk3vJNeP7nofboQuwHdsAPk7OKkvfLkEh3khHKJ uvJhMk6QqP+d8U+d4nSgtiJRAVelDv2/67qpwwyXE4Tj5g8sXcru1/6OFeMQybos UCFHkW6H0gD1B1Y7l4qYtLEwlQx4WA== =GWSW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--