[bug#27683] [PATCH] gnu: libjaylink: Update to 699b700. openocd: Update to 0.10.0

[Marius Bakke <mbakke@fastmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 815 bytes --]

Theodoros Foradis <theodoros.for@openmailbox.org> writes:

> Hello Leo,
>
>> Overall the changes look good to me, but can you clarify if they need to
>> be applied in the same commit like this?
>
> I remember reading somewhere (irc or mailing list probably), that a
> package should not break between commits (to be able to bisect). That
> would be the case with openocd, if libjaylink is updated before openocd.
>
> If this concern is not valid, I can split the commit in two and resubmit
> the patches.

There are certain cases where updating together make a lot of sense,
such as the gstreamer- or qt-family packages. But for mostly-unrelated
programs it's better to have the patches in bite-sized chunks.

I agree that they should be updated separately. We often break packages
in commits, wittingly or not ;-)

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 487 bytes --]