From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43942) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dpDg7-0008Ff-IC for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Sep 2017 09:14:17 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dpDg3-00013y-1r for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Sep 2017 09:14:07 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:41890) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dpDg2-00013r-Ug for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Sep 2017 09:14:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dpDg2-0006P6-OR for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Sep 2017 09:14:02 -0400 Subject: [bug#28330] [PATCH staging 2/2] gnu: boost: Update to 1.65.0. Resent-Message-ID: From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) References: <20170902130947.28372-1-mbakke@fastmail.com> <20170902130947.28372-2-mbakke@fastmail.com> Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2017 15:12:48 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20170902130947.28372-2-mbakke@fastmail.com> (Marius Bakke's message of "Sat, 2 Sep 2017 15:09:47 +0200") Message-ID: <87fuc1s2zz.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Marius Bakke Cc: 28330@debbugs.gnu.org Marius Bakke skribis: > * gnu/packages/boost.scm (%boost-1.65.0-context.patch, > %boost-1.65.0-fiber.patch): New variables. > (boost): Update to 1.65.0. > [source](patches): New field. [...] > + (version "1.65.0") Should we call it =E2=80=9C1.65.0.2=E2=80=9D to reflect the fact that we=E2= =80=99re applying two fixes? Otherwise LGTM, thanks! Ludo=E2=80=99.