From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40188) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f9DaL-0005vS-Vd for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Apr 2018 13:43:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f9DaI-0007Yj-PP for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Apr 2018 13:43:06 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:53509) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f9DaI-0007YZ-Kd for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Apr 2018 13:43:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f9DaI-0006OH-EX for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Apr 2018 13:43:02 -0400 Subject: [bug#31123] [PATCH 2/2] gnu: texlive-bin: Patch texlua shebangs. Resent-Message-ID: From: Marius Bakke In-Reply-To: References: <20180411060313.27912-1-arunisaac@systemreboot.net> <20180411060313.27912-2-arunisaac@systemreboot.net> <87muy2dctr.fsf@fastmail.com> Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2018 19:42:28 +0200 Message-ID: <87fu3r9jp7.fsf@fastmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Arun Isaac , 31123@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Arun Isaac writes: >> Would it suffice to only patch "out/bin" here? >> >> Also, what is the return value of (patch-source-shebangs)? If it's >> anything other than #t, you know what to do. Apart from that LGTM. > > Thank you for the review! I'll check and address both the above before I > push. But, considering the huge size (~ 2.2 GB) of the texlive-texmf > source tarball, and how hard it is to build from source, should I push > these patches to core-updates? Good point. You can push it to 'staging' which will require at least one more evaluation before it can be merged. That way we'll have substitutes ready when it lands in 'master', yet have the fix within a couple of weeks. Thank you! --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEu7At3yzq9qgNHeZDoqBt8qM6VPoFAlrY1QQACgkQoqBt8qM6 VPpUxAf/a+woHPXv4d3Gb4iRZ1nwaPmNmQPTnm1uzMux54kqpEvSmnLcb5My4r5g 86pUW5wr06/WdJoufogWsLmVJJiqHslgZ4sUr4ys/CnwHFlLsi/8lz1NPUP/OBoS i0CpntOb8BZV/cmj6RQPSOu/RK8V5YsrPhVBDcv6BR6V36bPK4UhZn1DqFZ0NKTa utlj3uwUgMdQoT/cwE9p8a9MwyKtFFw8etUlWcUg6D7d7tO2oePmKCA8EGSM1iqs rgFvJCxeBuj5CvktslKAtYMj4u41zZ0nJso/TRvODDo+qbP1tNo+viSGomEK52yL IpzCtTCxervxh/c25MhTuj26eVFOeQ== =BO9E -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--