From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55384) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fLwLF-00073h-3G for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 24 May 2018 15:56:05 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fLwLC-0000St-2k for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 24 May 2018 15:56:05 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:38983) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fLwLB-0000SW-Sa for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 24 May 2018 15:56:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fLwLB-00008y-I9 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 24 May 2018 15:56:01 -0400 Subject: [bug#31570] [PATCH 0/2] gnu: javacc: Bootstrap from javacc-4 instead of bootstrap binary. Resent-Message-ID: From: Alex Vong References: <871se2jnya.fsf@gmail.com> <877entcss1.fsf@mdc-berlin.de> Date: Fri, 25 May 2018 03:55:36 +0800 In-Reply-To: <877entcss1.fsf@mdc-berlin.de> (Ricardo Wurmus's message of "Thu, 24 May 2018 11:22:22 +0200") Message-ID: <87fu2gbzgn.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Ricardo Wurmus Cc: alexvong1995@gmail.com, 31570@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ricardo Wurmus writes: [...] > Can we delete these things in a snippet instead? > > (I vaguely remember that we didn=E2=80=99t use snippets for jars because > patch-and-repack wouldn=E2=80=99t support the jar format, but I don=E2=80= =99t know if > that=E2=80=99s still the case.) Indeed, it fails to build if I switch to use snippet. But I manage to fix it by adding java-junit to native-inputs :) (since the error message seems to be related to some missing junit symbols). Will send a revised patch series later. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEARYIAB0WIQTdXC2pN4kXBjiMDs8cGaIXrbrArQUCWwcYuQAKCRAcGaIXrbrA rfrkAQDvaE1uysAAsBIWBNDIGMTd/1uV7Pi0G6NXkIuM8AtQMwD+IPRec2jfi56N fvUEcWo1GUrMszUbAKzq0Go+qjh9Twg= =x7Wn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--