From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60156) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fbplg-0000mj-1A for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Jul 2018 12:09:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fbple-0002dh-R0 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Jul 2018 12:09:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:42442) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fbple-0002dU-N8 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Jul 2018 12:09:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fbple-000865-Ic for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Jul 2018 12:09:02 -0400 Subject: bug#31881: [PATCH 4/4] gnu: Add go-github-com-docker-distribution. Resent-To: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Message-ID: From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) References: <20180619084333.8993-1-pierre-antoine.rouby@inria.fr> <20180619084333.8993-4-pierre-antoine.rouby@inria.fr> <20180620170048.GD1240@jasmine.lan> <1040680639.2490239.1530026409131.JavaMail.zimbra@inria.fr> Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2018 18:08:33 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1040680639.2490239.1530026409131.JavaMail.zimbra@inria.fr> (Pierre-Antoine Rouby's message of "Tue, 26 Jun 2018 17:20:09 +0200 (CEST)") Message-ID: <87fu0v3u66.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Pierre-Antoine Rouby Cc: 31881-done@debbugs.gnu.org Hello! Pierre-Antoine Rouby skribis: >> From: "Leo Famulari" >>> + (source >>> + (origin >>> + (method git-fetch) >>> + (uri (git-reference >>> + (url "https://github.com/docker/distribution") >>> + (commit commit))) >> >> This bundles its entire dependency graph, including the logrus module >> you just packaged, and some other things we have packaged: > > I'm not sure vendor version is the same as package version. I have the > impression some Go package have no tag or CHANGELOG, so I'm not sure for > compatibility. Without explicit version number I thinks is more sure to > use the vendor version. > >> I think it's okay to add the package with the bundled code if everything >> is freely licensed. Can you confirm that it is? > > Yes, everything is free. Based on this I went ahead and applied it, but I added a FIXME about bundling. P-A, could you look into unbundling at least those that are already packaged? Thank you! Ludo=E2=80=99.