From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:55847) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hL1mJ-0002UF-RL for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Apr 2019 04:36:48 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hL1Z1-0005Tr-Tg for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Apr 2019 04:23:08 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:53055) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hL1Z1-0005Tk-RC for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Apr 2019 04:23:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hL1Z1-0001N3-43 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Apr 2019 04:23:03 -0400 Subject: bug#35456: [PATCH 1/1] guix package: Add 'install', 'remove', and 'upgrade' aliases. Resent-To: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Message-ID: From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= References: <20190427162500.13554-1-ludo@gnu.org> <20190427164907.14195-1-ludo@gnu.org> <87d0l72l0k.fsf@elephly.net> <8736m2csgs.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 10:22:42 +0200 In-Reply-To: <8736m2csgs.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic \=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\= \=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Sun, 28 Apr 2019 12:52:19 +0200") Message-ID: <87ftq1i5kd.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Ricardo Wurmus , Jonathan Brielmaier Cc: 35456-done@debbugs.gnu.org Hello! Ludovic Court=C3=A8s skribis: > Ricardo Wurmus skribis: [...] >> I have to admit that I never use =E2=80=9C--bootstrap=E2=80=9D. You alr= eady removed >> many advanced options of =E2=80=9Cguix package=E2=80=9D from this alias.= Would it make >> sense to also remove this one? > > It=E2=80=99s used only for tests in fact, where we don=E2=80=99t want to = rebuild the > world just to run profile hooks. Perhaps we could simply remove it from > the =E2=80=98--help=E2=80=99 output, WDYT? I did that and removed it altogether from =E2=80=98guix upgrade=E2=80=99 si= nce there are no tests using it. I also updated the Bash completion. Jonathan Brielmaier skribis: > If you are so confident, go ahead and make me happy by adding at least > 'guix search' :) Heheh thanks. :-) It also occurred to me that =E2=80=98guix search=E2=80=99 would be logical = as well, since that=E2=80=99s, again, one of the first commands one runs. I=E2=80= =99ll send a patch for that and then I=E2=80=99ll stop here, I promise! Ludo=E2=80=99.