From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44424) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1izfT0-0003Qu-Vi for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Feb 2020 06:37:08 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1izfSw-0007Ed-36 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Feb 2020 06:37:06 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:41128) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1izfSw-0007E5-07 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Feb 2020 06:37:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1izfSv-0003Zn-TB for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Feb 2020 06:37:01 -0500 Subject: [bug#38803] [PATCH] gnu: elfutils: Update to 0.178 Resent-Message-ID: From: Marius Bakke In-Reply-To: <58f284a926a93f9e079075ed0f7020ef63a03859.camel@klomp.org> References: <20191230014101.2425-1-mark@klomp.org> <20200112203939.20141-1-mark@klomp.org> <87a76sxun7.fsf@devup.no> <20200113000345.GA2825@wildebeest.org> <87a76rvvpz.fsf@devup.no> <20200131124321.GM3319@wildebeest.org> <87v9ormxrb.fsf@devup.no> <20200131165505.GN3319@wildebeest.org> <87d0as6a29.fsf@devup.no> <58f284a926a93f9e079075ed0f7020ef63a03859.camel@klomp.org> Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2020 12:36:40 +0100 Message-ID: <87ftfo3q2f.fsf@devup.no> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Mark Wielaard Cc: Brett Gilio , 38803@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mark Wielaard writes: >> For the 0.178 update, perhaps we can add the new version as a separate >> variable until we figure out how to isolate libelf.so? That can be done >> on the 'master' branch as long as we don't change the current 'elfutils' >> package. > > I am not sure I completely understand your proposal. When you say > 'separate variable', Do you mean we would (define-public elfutils-0.178=20 > ...)? Yes. See e.g 'gdb/next' or 'help2man/latest' for some examples of inheritance. > And changing the default libelf implementation should be a separate bug > I assume. Indeed. I suggest we defer that until we have 0.178+ in properly. > BTW. Upstream is now debating some of the dependencies for other > distros that have bootstrapping requirements too:=20 > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D25509 Good to know we're not alone! --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEu7At3yzq9qgNHeZDoqBt8qM6VPoFAl47+kgACgkQoqBt8qM6 VPqz+gf+K7s0EU9CoXzpB3neoaUnt283Z81Y3+TVgA66YzCr0CZaL5zFmWZWqQr7 w1loR+7u/TJy0dSaHok/rXoNr3l4S9Zvl/+8q/wScd6muwogMxLJfta4/VdtFjEl 7swS4ArSdbCqbvLAnTJkzcqYK6KaIhIofyEAfCJmUc5AVsGucZtBSX3NmBaQI1WD UPBmd0WFzU6Dt6yQQF3dTnxjwkm2uOnX+C1qoNeQBXAt9R8yPuBrV+8n5kRwWz1B 09bSy49ULLKC3to1A8uwE2CXJHlhqA6+Xv4FsZ5wajlZTGuHsMaoUls7KEbNuGmV csMJUiTzH9Q61Mhywc68Sv6T2eYInQ== =rB/U -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--