From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35839) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j6edk-0002yV-P3 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 13:09:05 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j6edi-00053b-Q9 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 13:09:04 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:50127) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j6edi-000534-Jw for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 13:09:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j6edi-00008N-DT for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 13:09:02 -0500 Subject: [bug#38546] [PATCH v4] Update Julia 1.3.1: almost done Resent-Message-ID: From: =?UTF-8?Q?Nicol=C3=B2?= Balzarotti In-Reply-To: References: <87imjvwvjx.fsf@guixSD.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 19:08:39 +0100 Message-ID: <87fteywndk.fsf@guixSD.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: zimoun Cc: 38546@debbugs.gnu.org zimoun writes: > Hi Nicol=C3=B2, > > On Mon, 24 Feb 2020 at 21:59, Nicol=C3=B2 Balzarotti wrote: > >> Here's a friendly 1.3.1 + HTTP.jl + dependencies patch submission. >> Hopefully this time it's fine. Package precompilation should be working >> now (except json, whose cache, for some reason, is not valid and gets >> rebuilt). > > Cool! Thank you. > I would like to first push 1.3.1, i.e., the patches v4. > OOk > Then let open another bug report with the patches attached here. > Otherwise, it seems a non-ending process. ;-) > > > About processing, if you use Magit to generate your patches, do not > forget to increment the reroll-count (W c C-m v) otherwise "git > format-patch -v5". It eases to know which version of the patches we > are talking about. For example, here it is the fifth. > Thanks! Didn't know about it. Should I re-submit them with the v5 prefix? > >> As a reminder: determinism is still not addressed and will be fixed in >> the 1.4.0 release (hopefully, upstream is still not that responsive). >> However, there are dozens of julia packages that I want to package, so >> if this first batch is finally fine, more will come. > > Yes, hope soon. :-) > Nicol=C3=B2 > > Cheers, > simon