From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:32781) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jGACJ-0006cx-5N for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Mar 2020 19:40:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jGACI-00076o-6Q for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Mar 2020 19:40:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:45199) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jGACI-00076k-3P for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Mar 2020 19:40:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jGACI-0002HL-01 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Mar 2020 19:40:02 -0400 Subject: [bug#38957] [PATCH] gnu: Add python-pywinrm Resent-Message-ID: References: <87k165uegp.fsf@gnu.org> From: Christopher Baines In-reply-to: Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2020 23:39:13 +0000 Message-ID: <87fte0559a.fsf@cbaines.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Alexandros Theodotou Cc: 38957@debbugs.gnu.org, Brett Gilio --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Alexandros Theodotou writes: > Hi Brett, > > Thanks for taking a look at this. > > On Mon, 2020-01-06 at 03:22 -0600, Brett Gilio wrote: >> Could you please split these package >> definitions into a patch series, rather than as a single patch? This >> is >> preferable for how our Git workflow is utilized so that we can keep >> track of packages individually in the commit log if we ever need to >> go >> back and look at our records. > > Attaching the split patches. Hi Alexandros, Sorry it's been so long to look more at these patches. I've had a look today and they look good to me. I had to fix some merge conflicts, and I changed the indentation in a couple of places, so I've sent the changed patches to the bug now. I'll let others take a look, and merge in a few days if it's all looking good. Thanks, Chris --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKTBAEBCgB9FiEEPonu50WOcg2XVOCyXiijOwuE9XcFAl539yFfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDNF ODlFRUU3NDU4RTcyMEQ5NzU0RTBCMjVFMjhBMzNCMEI4NEY1NzcACgkQXiijOwuE 9XdIxQ/+JA+lIpJbDmb63tZ+3Jm5fHkaFr6FtGddY5TN9WMzRYVu5nsDl55FCIjX p2sQdkuCgnQP3oP/hkkc5rdht9+oAXyQUNl4+jYiePUYqMY7AZdG/q5wsZRBOE0e aM7wMmK3p5HExxyBstlLUzaxlnXQFyQHuqAw8J80Utjgt2hjulsXKDUxU22NfQnh h8nVPNu+FpQva0WfBkpWz3pqcBBN/4MJDs4JFOQYHWWHnxhpqQQq4PMuiPb5Lnpn seqj7bvZo5G7DAXWhwM2s4m0J2Xtw4E3VE2TLlUZKTuEqid3HmE/pmXrrNA6S9XE 3LxGMIaYAiOnk1HKNCPO/izCWUyVM2352YEEeNz9t65bQP7u9qFmpFsVG7UZtI9I y7w2VxkTjcBhk04LVDTSSB8woAnzIxLDCBbQxtJAwfN3ZVTuFZSTPdIa9k2uvtcX iQ4Zi6isnxC7Tj6JQFZPxnk8e8jCQJlSIDg/azcHPlmaxVjH0FL1CSYt0bkvN+tJ QKDwbwE/uY1WlO+FINFqPJa1L7wO/DtP03gQsDmVmUmPBB4yySwqhTDRq/rZiF5K JF/FyChW0gBMSZNqmdsdiEk1hy2AClnqVKsdAdhmdBbS+aHlMT9D3PUNSXM5Nhxh 1XtaroZ9gzCzsyDxPLnumT0zmXj2yvvjlL8LwrwUxmzkhGvBKiM= =IDdQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--