Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> writes:

> I always understood that as with compression you're using 51G instead of
> 88G, and because of deduplication from the daemon it would only be 88G
> instead of 217G. I took the numbers from 'none' to mean that the daemon
> itself already did a lot of deduplication.

That's what I understood as well.

-- 
Pierre Neidhardt
https://ambrevar.xyz/