From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id qDpmOfPpUV/dNAAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 04 Sep 2020 07:17:07 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id 8EhQNfPpUV/hPgAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 04 Sep 2020 07:17:07 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 877619404D2 for ; Fri, 4 Sep 2020 07:17:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:52636 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kE5y6-000349-Fu for larch@yhetil.org; Fri, 04 Sep 2020 03:17:06 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:32934) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kE5y2-00033q-OQ for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Sep 2020 03:17:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:53823) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kE5y2-0003vZ-Fa for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Sep 2020 03:17:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kE5y2-0005y3-Bx for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Sep 2020 03:17:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#43183] [PATCH] gnu: Add loko-scheme. Resent-From: Mathieu Othacehe Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2020 07:17:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 43183 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Martin Becze Cc: 43183@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 43183-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B43183.159920378922890 (code B ref 43183); Fri, 04 Sep 2020 07:17:02 +0000 Received: (at 43183) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Sep 2020 07:16:29 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37135 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kE5xV-0005x7-42 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Sep 2020 03:16:29 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:50938) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kE5xU-0005wv-Bz for 43183@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Sep 2020 03:16:28 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:54066) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kE5xO-0003sg-VU; Fri, 04 Sep 2020 03:16:22 -0400 Received: from [2a01:e0a:19b:d9a0:9d9d:97cc:d92a:8ac0] (port=59660 helo=cervin) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kE5xO-0004o1-5j; Fri, 04 Sep 2020 03:16:22 -0400 From: Mathieu Othacehe References: <20200903150243.27796-1-mjbecze@riseup.net> <87k0xaqbxi.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2020 09:16:20 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Martin Becze's message of "Fri, 4 Sep 2020 01:49:38 -0500") Message-ID: <87ft7yqaez.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.01 X-TUID: rAUsDzXQxqsO > That is very true. But I'm not sure how to make a generic scheme > package. Guile, Chez and loko all have different directories that they > look for libraries in. Since Guile is the most popular wdyt about just > having those as guile packages to start with? Sure, this would be a good start. Thanks, Mathieu