From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e16b::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms8.migadu.com with LMTPS id AHIgNgAX4GVuWwAAe85BDQ:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 06:32:49 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e16b::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2.migadu.com with LMTPS id AHIgNgAX4GVuWwAAe85BDQ (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 06:32:48 +0100 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=ultrarare.space header.s=dkim header.b=GbJZVlRt; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1709184768; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:resent-cc:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references: list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post: dkim-signature; bh=Knn8JraSFH82GGtD9b2FCuxuNx9KfHuKioaZ7rRa1nE=; b=cs8dN8zy1aG1+1kUvd7tEJ1dO/ynkJPCjcLr+FeUdDZ4nVcPP9AWB56hbU1K+9ITEaFjsH pF08onwvjVGaNUjzSO/1WYeXg0cPJD57U1QxkP7wyz6h8rj5eCKEOCWKsFWIHEFfHZ+6cz KdfBYmsGcB2xmxukX7rmYun3QzNV3CYzyS8UbjbV8THRQjK1zElFdepN8JS/plVAlNFauw 9V8GQPX2SUF23Ii91ctvupmUIcUopk6ZDnsaqYOwjsBcoGU3HeQbF4CyyPm5xyTp4DhScK yPiRlKy1t2fyjDINKdIlUCJiL9DpjEHWMuGasRQ3GHqKNs51SytzgLqL0KLUUA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=ultrarare.space header.s=dkim header.b=GbJZVlRt; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1709184768; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=r+Y1zylFHVyez6hNmpY0SqQhuvrjbRP0AvKykSIasfqvEvlyqr7tQm9l1IIA7Jv46YDCjI MP15b0EO0LCD8kRN0x5SAtv3QWAyvISxQeqbEEzvYrPLRDj8iN4PIs6CwkqKAWh1ay0sEE a3RVkqrjlovbwFxyZKqQC82fOdiZ/NHwRYokUsEU1LsuFLhLwdPgiNx655fSLJl3MZ14PO WPrakLPv/J7toLXZb/oi3ONx0McXF2+4X/skXT+EvE+N2ZQNQ9qn6Dbz5yLCk+TYxDEk92 TXSVlupHm5bzQ/SGhccKbfEBn9wqIf82yhJgeR14A49CGwI4ljGdFsWhEm0Dbw== Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9EFE13A9CA for ; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 06:32:48 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rfZ24-0004Hs-QL; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 00:32:36 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rfZ24-0004Ha-0a for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 00:32:36 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rfZ23-00080O-Ow for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 00:32:35 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rfZ2U-00087D-80 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 00:33:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#69424] (No Subject) Resent-From: Hilton Chain Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 29 Feb 2024 05:33:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 69424 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Jiwei YANG Cc: 69424@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 69424-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B69424.170918477731177 (code B ref 69424); Thu, 29 Feb 2024 05:33:02 +0000 Received: (at 69424) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Feb 2024 05:32:57 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51446 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rfZ2N-00086f-Tl for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 00:32:56 -0500 Received: from mail.boiledscript.com ([144.168.59.46]:47684) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rfZ2L-00086T-V0 for 69424@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 00:32:54 -0500 Date: Thu, 29 Feb 2024 13:16:36 +0800 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ultrarare.space; s=dkim; t=1709184134; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Knn8JraSFH82GGtD9b2FCuxuNx9KfHuKioaZ7rRa1nE=; b=GbJZVlRtLJywkswqRUDHO4cVcOj6s+SpMUPaCgqLFZObFvWRN/P7039VD5WWnd/2T/XHyw slN2ptfymGqyAbYyOnb12W07cLpggMb0POj7mt+8PHcGCXkbctSyhGoh9aYVYV+PQfV9T9 /zzFJq1fPoJa2BrX9CUiJBTdKeU3rr+lCEKxCPmf5G6EUjHjtnA5+rkrA9oFS0AyHm9zkU g88QcH04rBNgEwBQDvvBMWjIdZCEAHFLmxy0D4Xcdptc45C6mftVGO9PrFTV+tanjKZ0Ye yOkED9V/TfQrhYF6hyBNK383dybs4TwwZmNLqjv2CPUEJQ7lBrW9VEz3ItL6og== Message-ID: <87frxb26kr.wl-hako@ultrarare.space> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Spamd-Bar: / X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-to: Hilton Chain X-ACL-Warn: , Hilton Chain via Guix-patches From: Hilton Chain via Guix-patches via Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -6.77 X-Spam-Score: -6.77 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 9EFE13A9CA X-Migadu-Scanner: mx13.migadu.com X-TUID: nUpw2MQl1YFn Hi! On Wed, 28 Feb 2024 20:19:41 +0800, Jiwei YANG via Guix-patches via wrote: > > Thanks! For font-google-noto-sans-cjk and font-google-noto-serif-cjk, will it > be good to use "Super OTC" fonts? In my case, LibreOffice (flatpak version) > was unable to recognize "Super OTC" edition but it is fixed now. There may > still be some compatibility problems that I have not noticed. Since in this series I'm switching to variable fonts, the (static) "Super OTC" format has no advantage in either feature or size. Thanks