unofficial mirror of guix-patches@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com>
To: Nicolas Graves <ngraves@ngraves.fr>
Cc: 74060@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: [bug#74060] [PATCH] gnu: Remove allegro-5.0. [security fixes]
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2024 21:30:13 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87frnw3a96.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <877c9867nm.fsf@ngraves.fr> (Nicolas Graves's message of "Tue, 12 Nov 2024 11:58:05 +0100")

Hi Nicolas,

Nicolas Graves <ngraves@ngraves.fr> writes:

> On 2024-11-11 15:17, Nicolas Graves via Guix-patches via wrote:
>
>> On 2024-11-11 21:37, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
>>
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> Nicolas Graves <ngraves@ngraves.fr> writes:
>>>
>>>> This package has no dependencies in Guix, is unsupported (see
>>>> https://liballeg.org/old.html) and is vulnerable to CVE-2021-36489.
>>>>
>>>> * gnu/packages/game-development.scm (allegro-5.0): Delete variable.
>>>> * gnu/local.mk: Deregister patch.
>>>> * gnu/packages/patches/allegro-mesa-18.2.5-and-later.patch: Delete file.
>>>
>>> We also have an allegro-4.0 variable; is this one not vulnerable?
>>> https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-36489 suggest it is (up to
>>> 5.2.6).
>>
>> If it is removable easily, we should remove it yes.  I might have
>> forgotten this one.
>>
>> They are indeed unsupported versions, I reported that upstream in
>> https://github.com/liballeg/allegro5/issues/1587
>> which confirmed that these versions won't receive security patches.
>
> Indeed there's still a package depending on allegro-4 (aseprite). I
> think that's the reason why I didn't consider updating it back then.
> The issue is that the new version of aseprite seems nonfree (restricts
> freedom to share the software, and the freedom to collaborate on the
> software).
>
> IMO we should remove both. Users can still use time-machine if they
> really want to use that version, or submit a new version of aseprite in
> nonguix. WDYT?

Sounds reasonable.  We now have a package removal police (info
'(guix)Deprecation Policy').  For leaf packages, it's as easy as sending
a patch removing a package for review, and giving it one month before
merging it, to let time for anyone to voice their opinion.

-- 
Thanks,
Maxim




      reply	other threads:[~2024-11-12 12:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-28 11:27 [bug#74060] [PATCH] gnu: Remove allegro-5.0. [security fixes] Nicolas Graves via Guix-patches via
2024-11-11 12:37 ` Maxim Cournoyer
2024-11-11 14:17   ` Nicolas Graves via Guix-patches via
2024-11-12 10:58     ` Nicolas Graves via Guix-patches via
2024-11-12 12:30       ` Maxim Cournoyer [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://guix.gnu.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87frnw3a96.fsf@gmail.com \
    --to=maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com \
    --cc=74060@debbugs.gnu.org \
    --cc=ngraves@ngraves.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).