From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:58f0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms13.migadu.com with LMTPS id YN5gGpQ7S2ehbgEAqHPOHw:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 30 Nov 2024 16:21:40 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:58f0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0.migadu.com with LMTPS id YN5gGpQ7S2ehbgEAqHPOHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 30 Nov 2024 17:21:40 +0100 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=debbugs.gnu.org header.s=debbugs-gnu-org header.b=B1CaXedP; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gnu.org header.s=fencepost-gnu-org header.b=EIWiMqR8; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F2A540790 for ; Sat, 30 Nov 2024 17:21:39 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tHQDZ-0006bn-WE; Sat, 30 Nov 2024 11:21:14 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tHQDS-0006aU-Cz for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Nov 2024 11:21:06 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tHQDP-0004kU-Li for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Nov 2024 11:21:04 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debbugs.gnu.org; s=debbugs-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:From:To:Subject; bh=IyH1ABE0yR0acGcoJCrMvMNNEb87etLNwEkaazNxCyA=; b=B1CaXedP63VwQuvNpPK1FFeEUd62TAPaWNHxToMVXv3eDzvwgOUY+EClPx1YjaFWof3A8y6ok1IX0lGz1UoZutFXxvP7chQjxzTNwj6DRTVORD16jb6wLE+OWpIO4veSMlGCCQiqoDVY2vAF0xozGduMqiUErhkcQlT7/wqLEpHQBmwJgO3MEzDOt1KczNCtYhL35dOUmilyWB8EgKIn+2ELMkIJ3IZMxuxlECrC4nIUH+6ga0q6XpM5YWk2j60t1ZP/uKWvyXw/qW74yXxBjp6MFIagvWzOeOhoL68tgert59I7XcZJePitvOIjo9yqhyKb7hfAB7sDW8DRD0jl3A==; Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tHQDP-0002Tn-GW for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Nov 2024 11:21:03 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#73615] [PATCH] gnu: gdb: Update to 15.2. Resent-From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2024 16:21:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 73615 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Greg Hogan Cc: Ashish SHUKLA , 73615@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 73615-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B73615.17329836028992 (code B ref 73615); Sat, 30 Nov 2024 16:21:03 +0000 Received: (at 73615) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Nov 2024 16:20:02 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48375 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tHQCP-0002Ku-KV for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 30 Nov 2024 11:20:02 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:37324) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tHQCM-0002KR-Rp for 73615@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 30 Nov 2024 11:19:59 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tHQCF-0004MW-Sg; Sat, 30 Nov 2024 11:19:52 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To: From; bh=IyH1ABE0yR0acGcoJCrMvMNNEb87etLNwEkaazNxCyA=; b=EIWiMqR8/iFXL5Xj9izK vCuunFfU9F7nVbV8tgtkjsWcI9/psVVpKcdReasX+MQEtcAHgAvjgdRQhNBe48Qhzaxym8ga4FqTm V3BICI22Ndm/aVzVrnXJA74iuAqobBJDG3fT40G3V3+L8wy9S8//K/+QmdFZ4Y/gHKjpsP8h5wi0P d/di+xu+e9tmmYHjF537Ll/HdfWw97KNvebR0OvddyyIIihr2JEvcEhKpMYmT4EHY31HgxeaxJ4LL IIJuzGV+ck1og1Qw98/1KJCaFtA7OJ0eEFx+wpAfc5uNnxbuWdqLFUfH10W185VP3NDMJP3KLVtAT U63WuJCw8I+dmQ==; From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= In-Reply-To: <87wmhx4qdr.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?="'s message of "Thu, 24 Oct 2024 14:49:52 +0200") References: <87wmhx4qdr.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2024 17:19:25 +0100 Message-ID: <87frn8y9rm.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Scanner: mx11.migadu.com X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -3.35 X-Spam-Score: -3.35 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 7F2A540790 X-TUID: Wsy5nNlGYHXm Ludovic Court=C3=A8s skribis: > Greg Hogan skribis: > >> On Thu, Oct 3, 2024 at 6:04=E2=80=AFPM Ashish SHUKLA wrote: >>> >>> I'm not sure the point of having an indirect reference, so this is why I >>> have not updated the `gdb' variable. >> >> Yes, that's a nice observation, if we only have one public choice then >> why the default selector? >> >> 'guix refresh' shows gdb with 414 dependent packages. It would be >> helpful if that partial dependency tree could be exported as in 'guix >> graph' to better identity packages which could be pinned to reduce >> that number. Even a simple option, means, or tool to filter out leaves >> would greatly reduce the list. > > See . > > I=E2=80=99ll rebase that pydevd patch and eventually apply it. Done in 94bb6a5a88b17da1178fdc1d16cb87b9913bc1c1. Should we (finally!) upgrade =E2=80=98gdb=E2=80=99 after renaming =E2=80=98= gdb-14=E2=80=99 to =E2=80=98gdb=E2=80=99? Ludo=E2=80=99.