From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41024) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1diRWP-0006wH-MJ for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Aug 2017 16:36:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1diRWM-0004r1-Fg for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Aug 2017 16:36:05 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:34505) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1diRWM-0004qf-3Y for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Aug 2017 16:36:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1diRWL-0001fm-QV for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Aug 2017 16:36:01 -0400 Subject: [bug#28053] Add radare2 Resent-Message-ID: From: Marius Bakke In-Reply-To: <877ey2k7fw.fsf@elephly.net> References: <20170811205612.14cc6088@lepiller.eu> <87a82zk0aw.fsf@elephly.net> <87mv6zywvv.fsf@fastmail.com> <877ey2k7fw.fsf@elephly.net> Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 22:35:29 +0200 Message-ID: <87efsaylta.fsf@fastmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Ricardo Wurmus Cc: 28053@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ricardo Wurmus writes: > Marius Bakke writes: > >> Ricardo Wurmus writes: >>>> + >>>> +;; This package has a timestamp embedded in >>>> +;; lib/python3.5/site-packages/capstone/__pycache__/__iti__.cpython-3= 5.pyc >>> >>> Please add =E2=80=9CFIXME: =E2=80=9D before the comment. >> >> FYI, there is an upstream patch (in review) that makes Python respect >> SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH when compiling bytecode. I'm going to try picking >> that for the 3.6 update, so this comment won't be necessary for long. > > Oh, that=E2=80=99s good. Will this fix the remaining reproducibility pro= blems > with Python? We also need to provide a stable PYTHONHASHSEED, but I do believe these measures will fix the vast majority of Python reproducibility issues. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEu7At3yzq9qgNHeZDoqBt8qM6VPoFAlmV/hEACgkQoqBt8qM6 VPrfwQf/drb+6EY+CuE5oS0PGkFGL5iN3arua57l7y7SO4jTtTk9HxtFIR6QXbv9 hqoPTunHYATck1J167blX/QYaIoaFi6I+iHVuSiwm4Ut8EnWwY5PcSPwh16y2Ic8 mfbbJ4NJ2HSvihTAUezhpiXjILNvHel2AgF15AKhxkE8t06Yi9WiEoontKFZmI1n F3sMpKo6zpd8o4z3Yzv+cPWB1dKLoL5I0+2+wLrkKGUhQQ4GznFesRUt41cPFTVd ynG34XTVAcxiRAPiDcCzEf33b2k4XKil/Rz12SXrp3UKh1c6ph3GmjRKCE7Wy2KB ur7i/63pesCB2v7wKSv4qWUEdL5lEw== =kKIz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--