From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42152) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dwwAB-0001sD-Em for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Sep 2017 16:09:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dwwAA-0008D9-Ip for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Sep 2017 16:09:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:53214) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dwwAA-0008D1-Ea for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Sep 2017 16:09:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dwwAA-0007w4-6T for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Sep 2017 16:09:02 -0400 Subject: [bug#27922] [PATCH] gnu: python-numpy: Update to 1.12.1. Resent-Message-ID: From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) References: <87bmlxhe8y.fsf@gnu.org> <20170926154620.GB11123@jasmine.lan> <20170926.185921.1683575194897240087.post@thomasdanckaert.be> Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2017 22:08:32 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20170926.185921.1683575194897240087.post@thomasdanckaert.be> (Thomas Danckaert's message of "Tue, 26 Sep 2017 18:59:21 +0200 (CEST)") Message-ID: <87efqtgr3z.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Thomas Danckaert Cc: 27922@debbugs.gnu.org Hi, Thomas Danckaert skribis: > From: Leo Famulari > Subject: Re: [bug#27922] [PATCH] gnu: python-numpy: Update to 1.12.1. > Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2017 11:46:20 -0400 > >> On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 01:48:45PM +0200, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: >>> Thomas Danckaert skribis: >>> > I can push a modified patch (with the pypi source) if it's ok. >>> Is there >>> > any reason we would not update to version 1.13.1 rightaway? >>> >>> If the dependents of NumPy build fine, I see no reason not to >>> upgrade to >>> 1.13.1. >>> >>> Thanks for picking this up! >> >> Yes, thank you! I got distracted and had to take a little break, >> which >> is why this patch fell by the wayside. > > Attached patch updates to 1.13.1. I had to add bash-minimal as a > native input because the numpy people made their build system a little > more convoluted ;-) (external commands such as gcc are run within a > shell with $SHELL -c 'gcc [...]', I didn't look up the motivation for > that). This is weird: bash-minimal is an implicit input already. What was the error exactly? Apart from that it looks great. Thanks! Ludo=E2=80=99.