From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51433)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1ejXUh-0000LF-7T
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Feb 2018 16:43:08 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1ejXUc-0004dY-7t
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Feb 2018 16:43:07 -0500
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:53860)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1ejXUc-0004dO-3a
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Feb 2018 16:43:02 -0500
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1ejXUb-0004e0-UA
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Feb 2018 16:43:01 -0500
Subject: [bug#30328] [PATCH] gnu: Add emacs-browse-at-remote-gnu.
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.30328.B30328.151803972617779@debbugs.gnu.org>
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
References: <20180202214457.14147-1-go.wigust@gmail.com>
	<87k1vq5ec3.fsf@gnu.org> <871shynjzi.fsf@gmail.com>
	<874lmt17jx.fsf@gnu.org> <877eroycvj.fsf@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2018 22:41:53 +0100
In-Reply-To: <877eroycvj.fsf@gmail.com> (Oleg Pykhalov's message of "Wed, 07
	Feb 2018 19:37:36 +0300")
Message-ID: <87eflwzdcu.fsf@gnu.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
	<mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
	<mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: Oleg Pykhalov <go.wigust@gmail.com>
Cc: 30328@debbugs.gnu.org

Oleg Pykhalov <go.wigust@gmail.com> skribis:

> ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes:
>
>   >>   > What about simply adding the patch to =E2=80=98emacs-browse-at-r=
emote=E2=80=99 if
>   >>   > it=E2=80=99s committed upstream way?
>   >>
>   >> I'm sorry, what do you mean by =E2=80=9Ccommitted upstream way=E2=80=
=9D?
>   >
>   > I mean that the patch for Savannah support is already in the reposito=
ry
>   > of =E2=80=98browse-at-remote=E2=80=99, isn=E2=80=99t it?
>
> Technically it is there.

Good.

>   > Which is to say that the next version of =E2=80=98browse-at-remote=E2=
=80=99 will
>   > have that functionality.
>   >
>   > I don=E2=80=99t know, won=E2=80=99t the next =E2=80=98browse-at-remot=
e=E2=80=99 include it?
>
> I hope so, but I cannot answer for them (upstream).

Well if it=E2=80=99s already in their repo, let=E2=80=99s assume it=E2=80=
=99ll be in the next
version.

>   > The output of =E2=80=98guix lint=E2=80=99 seems to be messy, too.
>
> Do you mean =E2=80=9Cfilled=E2=80=9D?  Sorry for that.

Several lines appear to overlap.

> So, what will our strategy be?  Stay close to upstream by making a new
> package with patch or patching the original package?

Patch the =E2=80=98emacs-browse-at-remote=E2=80=99 package, I=E2=80=99d say.

Sounds good?

Thanks,
Ludo=E2=80=99.