From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33430) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1epsi5-0002z7-CS for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Feb 2018 04:35:10 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1epsi0-0001AO-E2 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Feb 2018 04:35:09 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:51500) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1epsi0-00019D-A5 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Feb 2018 04:35:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1epshy-0000ai-45 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Feb 2018 04:35:03 -0500 Subject: [bug#29820] [PATCH] services: cgit: Add more configuration fields. Resent-Message-ID: References: <87incy9yv6.fsf@gmail.com> <87h8sdb6qa.fsf@lassieur.org> <87po6yu7h9.fsf@gmail.com> <871sjdz8ca.fsf@lassieur.org> <87r2q6zp2l.fsf@gmail.com> <87h8q6at2i.fsf@lassieur.org> <87muzxej3o.fsf@gmail.com> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Lassieur In-reply-to: <87muzxej3o.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2018 10:34:44 +0100 Message-ID: <87efl9beff.fsf@lassieur.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Oleg Pykhalov Cc: 29820@debbugs.gnu.org Oleg Pykhalov writes: > OK. Also I see in cgit README [1], they use “cgit” even in titles. > > On the other hand it feels wrong to me, because it's a name of the > program, like Guile, Guix, Linux or Emacs. It might be better to stick > to that convention for readability (e.g. not ‘cgit’ as a command or a > file name, but as a project name “Cgit”). And because of we rename even > configuration options like ‘scan-path’, it's OK to force the > capitalization also. WDYT? Our convention is to follow upstream convention. Guile, Linux, Emacs are all capitalized upsteam, which is why they are capitalized in Guix documentation. It's up to the upstream project to choose. Plus, cgit seems to pay a lot of attention to it. See, the title is: cgit - CGI for Git And then: Building cgit involves building a proper version of Git. Clearly they acknowledge that Git is capitalized (because upstream decided so), but cgit is not. So I think we should not capitalize it :-)