From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33973) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eqmq1-0006wc-Po for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 16:31:06 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eqmpy-0001Hp-MP for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 16:31:05 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:56372) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eqmpy-0001Hh-Hl for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 16:31:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eqmpy-00014B-8n for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 16:31:02 -0500 Subject: [bug#30532] [PATCH] Shepherd: Terminate all services upon SIGTERM or SIGHUP Resent-Message-ID: From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) References: <87sh9wnbu6.fsf@zancanaro.id.au> <87lgfe4vft.fsf@gnu.org> <20180227172243.GA19017@jasmine.lan> <87bmga9lm4.fsf@zancanaro.id.au> Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2018 22:30:18 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87bmga9lm4.fsf@zancanaro.id.au> (Carlo Zancanaro's message of "Wed, 28 Feb 2018 08:19:15 +1100") Message-ID: <87efl6w26t.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Carlo Zancanaro Cc: 30532@debbugs.gnu.org Carlo Zancanaro skribis: > On Tue, Feb 27 2018, Leo Famulari wrote: >> "This update broke my workflow" > > How seriously should I take this? I understand that it's a joke, but > are you currently relying on this behaviour of shepherd? I could add > an action to the root service to tell shepherd to leave processes > behind when it is killed, if we wanted to expose that behaviour. Maybe with an option: --signal-handling-style=3Dleo's? :-) Ludo=E2=80=99.