From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55383) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fHziJ-0008Li-2t for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 13 May 2018 18:43:36 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fHxjq-0006Xd-EQ for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 13 May 2018 16:37:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:53138) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fHxjq-0006XM-AF for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 13 May 2018 16:37:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fHxjq-0003iJ-2M for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 13 May 2018 16:37:02 -0400 Subject: [bug#31056] [PATCH] gnu: emacs-org: fix byte compilation Resent-Message-ID: From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) References: <87tvsrcgly.fsf@gnu.org> <87vad54yz2.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87o9it3lt8.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Date: Sun, 13 May 2018 22:36:21 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Konrad Hinsen's message of "Sun, 08 Apr 2018 17:49:38 +0200") Message-ID: <87efifl2d6.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Konrad Hinsen Cc: 31056@debbugs.gnu.org Hello, Nicolas, what=E2=80=99s the status of this patch? What should we do? TIA, :-) Ludo=E2=80=99. Konrad Hinsen skribis: > Hi Nicolas, > >>> The problem has been around for years, so I have given up hope for an >>> upstream fix. >> >> I don't think it is true. The problem is that Emacs ships with a very >> old Org. The problem is not exclusively on the Org side. > > I'd even say not at all. Nothing in Emacs seems to be made for having > two versions of the same library on load-path, so this shouldn't > happen. > > For me, the problem was integrating org-mode into Emacs without at the > same time synchronizing releases, though I am sure there were good > reasons for that as well. > >>> I doubt anyone will work on a fix in the meantime. >> >> I suggested a possible fix. Would that work? > > No idea. All I did is translate to Guix a well-known trick for fixing > the problem with ELPA-based installations. > > My Emacs-Fu isn't advanced enough to even understand what really causes > the error. Much less to judge if the fix you propose would work, and if > it does, how many similar problems would need to be fixed after that > one. > > Konrad.