From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33667) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hk6rn-0004Ci-EF for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Jul 2019 09:06:09 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hk6rl-0002Mj-Ik for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Jul 2019 09:06:07 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:47458) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hk6ri-0002Kp-D4 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Jul 2019 09:06:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hk6ri-0003u3-6V for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Jul 2019 09:06:02 -0400 Subject: [bug#36404] [PATCH 2/3] machine: Reimplement 'managed-host-environment-type' deployment. Resent-Message-ID: From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= References: <87o92ianbj.fsf@sdf.lonestar.org> <87o92glap5.fsf@dustycloud.org> <878sthoqzi.fsf@gnu.org> <87r2799tzd.fsf@sdf.lonestar.org> <87d0isrsmk.fsf@sdf.lonestar.org> <878std3fw0.fsf@sdf.lonestar.org> <87wogwoqrg.fsf@gnu.org> <87bly8f3kq.fsf_-_@sdf.lonestar.org> <877e8wf3iz.fsf_-_@sdf.lonestar.org> <8736jkf3h5.fsf_-_@sdf.lonestar.org> <87v9weco5x.fsf@dustycloud.org> Date: Sun, 07 Jul 2019 15:05:31 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87v9weco5x.fsf@dustycloud.org> (Christopher Lemmer Webber's message of "Sun, 07 Jul 2019 03:13:46 -0400") Message-ID: <87ef32dmg4.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Christopher Lemmer Webber Cc: 36404@debbugs.gnu.org Christopher Lemmer Webber skribis: > In some ways it looks like a portion of the previous patch and a portion > of this patch are a "move and modify" of what are sort-of the same > chunks of code. But it's a bit weird to me that the code is added in > the previous commit and removed in this one? It might be clearer to the > reader that this is what is happening if it's in the same commit. Yes, good point. Ludo=E2=80=99.