Kei, Kei Kebreau 写道: > * gnu/packages/music.scm (audacious): New variable. > --- > gnu/packages/music.scm | 102 > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 102 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/gnu/packages/music.scm b/gnu/packages/music.scm > index a43bccf4f8..33c53dec35 100644 > --- a/gnu/packages/music.scm > +++ b/gnu/packages/music.scm > @@ -203,6 +203,108 @@ and play MIDI files with a few clicks in a > user-friendly interface offering > score, keyboard, guitar, drum and controller views.") > (license license:gpl3+))) > > +(define-public audacious > + (package > + (name "audacious") > + (version "3.10.1") > + (source (origin > + (method url-fetch) > + (uri (string-append > "https://distfiles.audacious-media-player.org/" > + "audacious-" version > ".tar.bz2")) > + (sha256 > + (base32 > + > "14vbkhld5hwh96j8p8hjq9ybvc2m060a1y8crz14i51wpd0fhrl3")))) > + (build-system gnu-build-system) > + (arguments > + `(#:configure-flags > + (list "--disable-gtk" "--enable-qt" > + ;; Add the output lib directory to the RUNPATH. > + (string-append "LDFLAGS=-Wl,-rpath=" %output > "/lib")) This comment just repeats the code, so it's not needed. > + #:tests? #f ; no check target Could you run C-M-q (or etc/indent-code.el) on the whole definition? That will allow later editors to do the same without changing unrelated lines. > + #:phases > + (modify-phases %standard-phases > + (add-after 'install 'unpack-plugins > + (lambda* (#:key inputs #:allow-other-keys) > + (let ((plugins (assoc-ref inputs > "audacious-plugins"))) > + (invoke "tar" "xvf" plugins) > + (chdir (string-append "audacious-plugins-" > ,version)) It's not wrong, and I know this saves (with-directory-excursion)s down the road, but brr. :-) > + #t))) > + (add-after 'unpack-plugins 'configure-plugins > + (lambda* (#:key configure-flags outputs > #:allow-other-keys) > + (let ((out (assoc-ref outputs "out"))) > + (substitute* "configure" > + (("/bin/sh") (which "sh"))) > + (apply invoke "./configure" > + (append configure-flags > + ;; audacious-plugins requires > audacious to build. > + (list (string-append > "PKG_CONFIG_PATH=" > + out > "/lib/pkgconfig:" > + (getenv > "PKG_CONFIG_PATH")) > + (string-append "--prefix=" > out))))))) > + (add-after 'configure-plugins 'build-plugins > + (lambda _ > + (invoke "make" "-j" (number->string > (parallel-job-count))))) > + (add-after 'build-plugins 'install-plugins > + (lambda _ > + (invoke "make" "install")))))) > + (native-inputs > + `(("audacious-plugins" > + ,(origin > + (method url-fetch) > + (uri (string-append > "https://distfiles.audacious-media-playerorg/" ^^^^^^^^^ Typo! > + "audacious-plugins-" version > ".tar.bz2")) > + (sha256 > + (base32 > + > "0hi61825ayrwc4snwr76f2669k06fii3n8ll1szjk5zr65v1ghzf")))) I don't mind bundling these like this (Audacious's a leaf package and — subjectively — media things are allowed/expected to be a bit bloaty), but it may prove controversial :-) Would it not be worth supporting a plug-in search path? Are there, for example, well-supported Audacious plug-ins that aren't part of this collection? $ guix size audacious-with-plugins # although I'd prefer 2 packages … total: 1649.2 MiB $ guix size audacious # no plugins or plugin inputs … total: 1333.9 MiB Have you considered a separate ‘audacious-plugins’ package that could use that mechanism? Why [not]? > + ("gettext" ,gettext-minimal) > + ("glib:bin" ,glib "bin") ; for gdbus-codegen > + ("pkg-config" ,pkg-config))) > + (inputs > + `(("dbus" ,dbus) > + ("glib" ,glib) > + ("qtbase" ,qtbase) > + ;; Plugin dependencies > + ("alsa-lib" ,alsa-lib) > + ("curl" ,curl) > + ("ffmpeg" ,ffmpeg) > + ("flac" ,flac) > + ("fluidsynth" ,fluidsynth) > + ("gdk-pixbuf" ,gdk-pixbuf) > + ("libbs2b" ,libbs2b) > + ("libcddb" ,libcddb) > + ("libcdio-paranoia" ,libcdio-paranoia) > + ("libcue" ,libcue) > + ("libmodplug" ,libmodplug) > + ("libnotify" ,libnotify) > + ("libogg" ,libogg) > + ("libsamplerate" ,libsamplerate) > + ("libsndfile" ,libsndfile) > + ("libvorbis" ,libvorbis) > + ("libxml2" ,libxml2) > + ("lirc" ,lirc) > + ("jack" ,jack-1) > + ("mpg123" ,mpg123) > + ("neon" ,neon) > + ("pulseaudio" ,pulseaudio) > + ("qtmultimedia" ,qtmultimedia) > + ("soxr" ,soxr) > + ("wavpack" ,wavpack))) > + (home-page "https://audacious-media-player.org") > + (synopsis "Audio player based on XMMS") Hmm. To me, ‘Foo copied a lot of files from bar once’ is never a useful answer to ‘What is foo?’. All ‘XMMS’ means to me is ‘that ugly audio player I installed and then immediately removed in the nineties’. Now, that may be all I need to know about Audacious, I don't know :o) I hope it's not. Is there something in particular that distinguishes Audacious from most other players that we could mention instead? > + (description > + "Audacious is an audio player descended from XMMS. Drag > and drop folders > +and individual song files, search for artists and albums in > your entire music > +library, or create and edit your own custom playlists. Listen > to CD’s or stream > +music from the Internet. Tweak the sound with the graphical > equalizer or > +experiment with LADSPA effects. Enjoy the modern GTK-themed > interface or change > +things up with Winamp Classic skins. Use the plugins included > with Audacious to > +fetch lyrics for your music, to set an alarm in the morning, > and more.") > + ;; According to COPYING, Audacious and its plugins are > licensed under the > + ;; BSD 2-clause license and libguess is licensed under the > BSD 3-clause > + ;; license. > + (license (list license:bsd-2 > + license:bsd-3)))) From COPYING: “Please note that many of the plugins distributed with Audacious are under different licenses.” And indeed, I see quite a bit of GPL and some ISC code in there. Thanks! T G-R