From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47283)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1iRkY1-0001wd-Td
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Nov 2019 17:10:07 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1iRkXz-0001Za-CP
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Nov 2019 17:10:05 -0500
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:57066)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1iRkXy-0001X0-HV
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Nov 2019 17:10:03 -0500
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1iRkXy-0006YN-BX
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Nov 2019 17:10:02 -0500
Subject: [bug#37991] (no subject)
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.37991.B37991.157290537525140@debbugs.gnu.org>
From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
References: <20191030130836.728314-1-josh@inv.alid.pw>
 <87ftja4bp0.fsf@inv.alid.pw>
Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2019 23:09:24 +0100
In-Reply-To: <87ftja4bp0.fsf@inv.alid.pw> (Josh Holland's message of "Wed, 30
 Oct 2019 13:14:51 +0000")
Message-ID: <87eeyn5m5n.fsf@gnu.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: Josh Holland <josh@inv.alid.pw>
Cc: 37991@debbugs.gnu.org

Hello,

Josh Holland <josh@inv.alid.pw> skribis:

> Alternatively, I suppose this package could replace the original
> redshift altogether.

Yeah, if it works for both X11 and Wayland, we might simply keep this
one.  Could you check =E2=80=98guix size redshift=E2=80=99 vs. =E2=80=98gui=
x size
redshift-wayland=E2=80=99, to estimate the cost of supporting both X and
Wayland?

If the cost in size is too important, then we could keep separate
packages, but in that case one should inherit from the other to reduce
duplication.

Thanks,
Ludo=E2=80=99.