From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43883) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iqwYp-0002ni-8Q for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Jan 2020 05:03:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iqwYo-0002mB-9K for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Jan 2020 05:03:03 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:52716) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iqwYo-0002lv-5Y for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Jan 2020 05:03:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iqwYo-0005R6-2J for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Jan 2020 05:03:02 -0500 Subject: [bug#38846] [PATCH 0/4] Move 'HACKING' to the manual, and a proposal for commit access Resent-Message-ID: From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= References: <20200101162945.4946-1-ludo@gnu.org> <87h814s2ts.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2020 11:01:59 +0100 In-Reply-To: (zimoun's message of "Fri, 10 Jan 2020 16:49:21 +0100") Message-ID: <87eew3r7xk.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: zimoun Cc: GNU Guix maintainers , 38846@debbugs.gnu.org Hello, zimoun skribis: > To be clear, the person with the score of 53.61% "reviews" half as > many commits they authors. > > And the mean is almost 37%. Cool, no? > > > Well, it is not possible to draw an strong conclusion, just a weak > one: Guix is healthy. ;-) Oh yes, that=E2=80=99s an interesting (and nice!) conclusion. Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.