From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id mLg9HM4UMV+PAgAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 09:35:10 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id SENIGM4UMV9KCgAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 09:35:10 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1302394004E for ; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 09:35:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:51132 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k54Cy-0003IP-Vs for larch@yhetil.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 05:35:09 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60584) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k54Ct-0003GK-A8 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 05:35:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:51080) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k54Ct-0001E9-13 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 05:35:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k54Cs-0000ZV-Uj for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 05:35:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#42767] [PATCH] gnu: Add rttr. Resent-From: Mathieu Othacehe Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2020 09:35:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 42767 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Michael Rohleder Cc: 42767@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 42767-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B42767.15970520832154 (code B ref 42767); Mon, 10 Aug 2020 09:35:02 +0000 Received: (at 42767) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Aug 2020 09:34:43 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34391 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k54CY-0000Yg-Ke for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 05:34:42 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:50354) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k54CX-0000YR-FD for 42767@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 05:34:41 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:46391) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k54CR-0001CY-B9; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 05:34:35 -0400 Received: from [2a01:e0a:19b:d9a0:3107:b202:556:bd51] (port=46114 helo=cervin) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1k54CQ-00067F-U8; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 05:34:35 -0400 From: Mathieu Othacehe References: <20200808175320.12200-1-mike@rohleder.de> Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2020 11:34:33 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20200808175320.12200-1-mike@rohleder.de> (Michael Rohleder's message of "Sat, 8 Aug 2020 19:53:20 +0200") Message-ID: <87eeoehmja.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.01 X-TUID: rK5PsVjS5BeE Hello Michael, Thanks for this patch. Did you change something to the way you are sending patches? I have troubles to apply them, with errors such as: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- Applying: gnu: Add rttr. Using index info to reconstruct a base tree... M gnu/packages/cpp.scm error: patch failed: gnu/packages/cpp.scm:82 error: gnu/packages/cpp.scm: patch does not apply error: Did you hand edit your patch? --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- > + (home-page "https://github.com/rttrorg/rttr/") This field is traditionally at the end of the package definition, right before synopsis. > + (source > + '(#:tests? #f ; TODO You could elaborate on why they are not enabled. Something to fix in particular? > + #:configure-flags > + '("-DBUILD_UNIT_TESTS=OFF" > + "-DBUILD_DOCUMENTATION=OFF"))) > + (native-inputs `(("pkg-config" ,pkg-config))) > + (synopsis "C++ Reflection Library") > + (description > + "RTTR stands for Run Time Type Reflection. It describes the ability of a > +computer program to introspect and modify an object at runtime. It is also the > +name of the library itself, which is written in C++ and released as open > +source library.") There are a couple of linting warnings on this description. No need to mention that it's open source :). Thanks, Mathieu