From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e224::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms13.migadu.com with LMTPS id CFSgCAIKcmebXgEAe85BDQ:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 30 Dec 2024 02:48:34 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e224::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2.migadu.com with LMTPS id CFSgCAIKcmebXgEAe85BDQ (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 30 Dec 2024 03:48:34 +0100 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=debbugs.gnu.org header.s=debbugs-gnu-org header.b=LzsZKe2g; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=protonmail.com header.s=protonmail3 header.b="WuHoZn/f"; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1735526914; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=xVnQ0WhTjXb9nY2uMUDUZDGh/KPizOppSbxwv4a9o5g=; b=pYgJYpRltXIdw/XLPZLyVYM2UFkDSxLI1TzB8P2xyYGYwsqPYNfaB9Zx/7HQwWzdBaidW0 hO7Y83hXXgDdxnTN3LV9z1XrXexDm47+pmLIBNgG4tyUnlTCPDl5ij61BCmR+DqZh/8ZHZ cciWINpYN1och0Dr9wSus1WqgCT0zv9IAlVmenvHvCe4ZGTx/CqFeNJJMVxyNyObxzhwwJ 1tzU9PJXUFF6dQryW0Ddcy0NCDY6fuPII4kX5XZWbk7FZx/lRJukd3QxZIiswkaX4+Ryj+ yEE3WX01atf0EbIH5pBL4eNp76teT1tLqwrD4cMyYNOn50IwKc4tr2uX5AjQsg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=debbugs.gnu.org header.s=debbugs-gnu-org header.b=LzsZKe2g; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=protonmail.com header.s=protonmail3 header.b="WuHoZn/f"; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1735526914; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=dM5Q66hgHcjz+sjKPackJiGZMYywri0IjAzSvbwH5cML+uhiCteDmDOFPOM+CNHyluQLAu UfNG14sdf+Ihpx2/i3MCc/6wet/muDxUYGKNH+3c+TBpG0iU0OZtBzASgarI1V+99WwZGG cDvweapNHfVEZxxi5HFJpVODIIPt00mz/Lzt333zahbf6yAWpK/1Lf+DDxHEzZmBEF+/Gn G5WCNn/NpG03PFrTVChyeE7mpL1YS3IwkzgFaUpAgXFqaNLheeP+Qpr0VLMi89cdeGPftg luXmJC7cFwtAJR8QzaiKot8fCjZl0b92AKp6SOHX+7pnNoy/APdrcmnx+N5BSQ== Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E404B4D01 for ; Mon, 30 Dec 2024 03:48:33 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tS5p9-0005eX-3v; Sun, 29 Dec 2024 21:48:07 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tS5p5-0005e3-27 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Dec 2024 21:48:03 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tS5p4-0001p4-Pu for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Dec 2024 21:48:02 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debbugs.gnu.org; s=debbugs-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:To:Subject; bh=xVnQ0WhTjXb9nY2uMUDUZDGh/KPizOppSbxwv4a9o5g=; b=LzsZKe2g6fjWeHan/f+l4vybz5HCjv0o3gbQ+TWzWaNdBxeOW4Lhi1pRPAN+EoNX1Mv15SLHwiV9qUtGAYX/gVauiag6Zo/melEfeshVfUncqffLc4A2bnUjZzJKERluvX33VqZ9Lqe0RmNbqUrRj7sOGV4FxQT65+zo2vkE1MDeY4wchxER4gOE6vgjJXn/XCqy45MVSioyVO11v0Kwj7/LjfbVB3ug/8jfQ/CQgHs1KgYc0/0P/+zVBpOc9k+CYLfT3BOAwv7FHUiq+jL50JWVgsGR7AbMj2xKlolgBJH7j1eEofiFupgaskMaXi10ZL33OSAHCKzkAyN6R9T0GQ==; Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tS5p3-0003l5-Li for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Dec 2024 21:48:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#74780] Request for merging "mesa-updates" branch Resent-From: John Kehayias Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2024 02:48:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 74780 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 74780@debbugs.gnu.org, Efraim Flashner Received: via spool by 74780-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B74780.173552682214372 (code B ref 74780); Mon, 30 Dec 2024 02:48:01 +0000 Received: (at 74780) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Dec 2024 02:47:02 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56783 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tS5o5-0003ja-Er for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Dec 2024 21:47:01 -0500 Received: from mail-40134.protonmail.ch ([185.70.40.134]:61439) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tS5nx-0003j2-Je for 74780@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Dec 2024 21:46:58 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail3; t=1735526806; x=1735786006; bh=xVnQ0WhTjXb9nY2uMUDUZDGh/KPizOppSbxwv4a9o5g=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID: Message-ID:BIMI-Selector:List-Unsubscribe:List-Unsubscribe-Post; b=WuHoZn/fGUE3ALhR4ZOervdxnDeqk/EQpkGH+EqJtoeTQepcLlVqPBA5VruJQVpue d3S2WlyMD7/qYxRNh6G+ZvKQXlj0XC/OOPh2hl5I4APOR05v6Q8pBUu5YuaZgfezGf jE8NyB2TJvR0Qq0ha5ikgzioch7p7ngbXhzd/wGe7X/UhIu7wBx1ZOtLBzLq0u4G81 1nuwkq27xe9w9aCPKDqp4ymfe/uiZsvFwihtDojAnHzmnv6rfccTfcmmirJGzsUN4I qYHfEcYaY6i9vrCVGHruPkJkUATqa2Vc7y9ty8HyBISX+we8TCa3FOUVWgqahjk2o1 xivGWv3SL0HCA== Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2024 02:46:43 +0000 Message-ID: <87ed1pnb02.fsf@protonmail.com> In-Reply-To: <877c7ir0y8.fsf_-_@gnu.org> References: <8734iubuk1.fsf@protonmail.com> <87a5cqxfik.fsf@protonmail.com> <877c7ir0y8.fsf_-_@gnu.org> Feedback-ID: 7805494:user:proton X-Pm-Message-ID: fb3eb5775a1c042a685eccc68b83b69067db9617 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-to: John Kehayias X-ACL-Warn: , John Kehayias via Guix-patches From: John Kehayias via Guix-patches via Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Scanner: mx12.migadu.com X-Migadu-Spam-Score: 0.80 X-Spam-Score: 0.80 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: E404B4D01 X-TUID: dTH29NpYKd9I Hi all, On Sun, Dec 29, 2024 at 03:57 PM, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > Hey John and all, > > It=E2=80=99s the turn of the =E2=80=9Cmesa-updates=E2=80=9D branch to be = merged: > > > > :-) > > Ludo=E2=80=99. Thanks for checking in. I just rebased and pushed. I'll keep an eye on it but didn't notice any big failures (plenty on earlier evaluations but mostly due to the python merge from what I can tell). The question is what the substitute coverage will be like on non-x86_64-linux. It had already been about 9-10 days from the last update and didn't seem like much progress. And with QA back up but very behind, not sure if we expect that to tell us anything soon. Should I give it a day or so to build the current rebase and then just merge? From Efraim's local builds and given the nature of the commits, I don't expect any big surprises. (Side note: does i686-linux have priority on Berlin or something like that? The last few weeks I notice many more active i686 builds after a push with many pending builds. The current evaluation, for instance: the vast majority of workers are idle, and then the vast majority of active are i686 builds. Or is that from just generally being behind on i686 so there's just more of that to do?) Thanks! John