From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:60955)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1h40mt-0007H0-Oq
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 06:07:07 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1h40mt-00069i-13
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 06:07:03 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:55738)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1h40ms-00069b-RS
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 06:07:02 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1h40mr-0001Hf-Rz
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 06:07:02 -0400
Subject: [bug#34613] Acknowledgement ([PATCH] gnu: Add prometheus.)
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.34613.B34613.15524716024906@debbugs.gnu.org>
From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
References: <20190222114537.1431-1-boskovits@gmail.com>
	<handler.34613.B.155083599830524.ack@debbugs.gnu.org>
	<CAE4v=phFeyXQOY59QbPkZKCRLsNFc5EhDJ_UCOzjsoSD3yT36A@mail.gmail.com>
	<87k1h5rr3k.fsf@gnu.org>
	<CAE4v=phonQqRR+1B+0cDagNYN9owhk1Vw2WhtZebNR0qucgCvA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 11:06:29 +0100
In-Reply-To: <CAE4v=phonQqRR+1B+0cDagNYN9owhk1Vw2WhtZebNR0qucgCvA@mail.gmail.com>
	("=?UTF-8?Q?G=C3=A1bor?= Boskovits"'s message of "Tue, 12 Mar 2019
	22:29:12 +0100")
Message-ID: <87d0mvay1m.fsf@gnu.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
	<mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
	<mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: =?UTF-8?Q?G=C3=A1bor?= Boskovits <boskovits@gmail.com>
Cc: 34613@debbugs.gnu.org, Pierre Neidhardt <mail@ambrevar.xyz>

Hi,

G=C3=A1bor Boskovits <boskovits@gmail.com> skribis:

> Ludovic Court=C3=A8s <ludo@gnu.org> ezt =C3=ADrta (id=C5=91pont: 2019. m=
=C3=A1rc. 11., H, 23:20):
>>
>> Hi G=C3=A1bor!
>>
>> G=C3=A1bor Boskovits <boskovits@gmail.com> skribis:
>
>>
>> Glyphicons appears to be non-free, indeed.  Could you check what Debian
>> does, for instance?  It may be that we can just remove or replace it
>> with something else.
>
> I've checked this, this is not actually included in the prometheus
> source anywhere,
> only copied from the influxdb license file. The only other appearance
> of glyphicons
> in the code is for the web interface, where it is part of bootstrap,
> and as such it is under
> apl2.0 there.
>
> I don't know if it is a problem to allow this influxdb module stub to
> live in the source,
> but I don't think so... (I would not consider this as a case of
> promoting use of non-free
> software.) Wdyt?

What=E2=80=99s influxdb?  I=E2=80=99m afraid I don=E2=80=99t understand thi=
s sufficiently well
to provide useful comments, but I trust you to make the right decision.
:-)

The thing is, Glyphicons does seem to be non-free, so if it ends up
being included one way or another, we have a problem.  I would have
expected Debian to provide replacement icons or something like that.

Thanks,
Ludo=E2=80=99.