From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39504) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iVd8q-0007PN-Up for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 10:04:13 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iVd8p-0006Pg-LJ for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 10:04:08 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:56634) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iVd8p-0006Pb-If for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 10:04:07 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iVd8p-0007TC-51 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 10:04:07 -0500 Subject: [bug#38214] [PATCH] gnu: Add minisat. Resent-Message-ID: References: <20191115023401.8126-1-robertsmith@posteo.net> From: Mathieu Othacehe In-reply-to: <20191115023401.8126-1-robertsmith@posteo.net> Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2019 16:03:35 +0100 Message-ID: <87d0dtfago.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: 38214@debbugs.gnu.org Cc: robertsmith@posteo.net Hello Robert, Thanks for your patch, a few remarks below. > + (search-patches "minisat-friend-declaration.patch" > + "minisat-mroot-and-install.patch")))) Why are these patch needed? It seems that the last release was a long time ago, maybe we should package it from a git commit? > + ("kernel-headers" ,linux-libre-headers))) ^ Is this really useful? It seems to build without. > + (synopsis > + "Small, yet efficient, SAT solver with good documentation") > + (license license:expat) It's a tacit agreement, but the order of package fields is often: - synopsis - description - home-page - license. Could you re-order those fields? Do not forget to add your copyright on top of the file, and to indent your code properly (see: https://guix.gnu.org/manual/en/html_node/Formatting-Code.html). Could you send an updated patch? Thanks, Mathieu