From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36748) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ii2IB-0005cT-7B for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 15:21:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ii2IA-0006rc-5m for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 15:21:03 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:39591) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ii2I9-0006pW-Sp for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 15:21:01 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ii2I9-0002nC-NN for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 15:21:01 -0500 Subject: [bug#35866] [PATCH] gnu: Add qtwebengine. Resent-Message-ID: References: <20190523062344.20601-1-mrosset@bufio.org> <20191218203223.22861-1-mike.rosset@gmail.com> From: Ricardo Wurmus In-reply-to: <20191218203223.22861-1-mike.rosset@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2019 21:19:49 +0100 Message-ID: <87d0ckqd96.fsf@elephly.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: mike.rosset@gmail.com Cc: Marius Bakke , GNU Guix maintainers , 35866@debbugs.gnu.org Hi Mike, > * gnu/packages/qt.scm (qtwebengine): New variable. > > This is a new qtwebengine patch with working locales. Thank you very much for working on this! This doesn=E2=80=99t look like an= easy package. > + (description "Qt5WebEngine provides support for web > +applications using the Chromium browser project.") Does this include the unmodified Chromium source code? We need to ensure that the variant we are distributing here does not contain any misfeatures that Chromium is known for (e.g. DRM support) and that only free software is included. Marius and others previously worked very hard on making sure that the ungoogled-chromium package complied with our expectations for Chromium. I wonder what work needs to be done on the sources included in this package to accomplish the same goal. Did you happen to investigate this? -- Ricardo