From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33906)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1ismnj-0005kE-DA
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jan 2020 07:02:04 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1ismni-0003cV-8w
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jan 2020 07:02:03 -0500
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:34639)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1ismni-0003c9-42
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jan 2020 07:02:02 -0500
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1ismni-0002mc-1v
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jan 2020 07:02:02 -0500
Subject: [bug#38678] Command line option in addition to GUIX_PACKAGE_PATH -
 Reason?
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.38678.B38678.157934892010690@debbugs.gnu.org>
From: Pierre Neidhardt <mail@ambrevar.xyz>
In-Reply-To: <CAJ3okZ3xqX=E8=i9Yhw01HYzx5Ry8irLOT2z=j2ryonnoL=h4Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <87pnglj2ka.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
 <CAJ3okZ3X5DZ3DVDXY5_WHEOzL01=nJGkJeBHZxL-1eLS3x8c8g@mail.gmail.com>
 <87sglgsiey.fsf@lassieur.org> <878sn8inru.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
 <87o8w4mewg.fsf@gnu.org> <87tv5wfdrm.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
 <CAJ3okZ0_5AB57FgNyagAA-KCOW=o7AgDrr4v5p8n4XvEmJH7=g@mail.gmail.com>
 <87lfr8fd9u.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <20191226213108.753f8ab7@scratchpost.org>
 <CAJ3okZ2HSh_WbiWEz65-A_LZLgN91Dc-rAQe_7PbA09YQid64Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <87blr3eao0.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
 <CAJ3okZ3G5YteTpMJdsfUHHp=LrzZ593OrZAaupk=x7bp3CZ-3Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <87ftge13h5.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
 <CAJ3okZ0UpdL-u4mayy8iLtaKK72VSHd2YkTu1FY8NYj6Pi=4AA@mail.gmail.com>
 <87y2u6yqat.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
 <CAJ3okZ3xqX=E8=i9Yhw01HYzx5Ry8irLOT2z=j2ryonnoL=h4Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2020 13:01:54 +0100
Message-ID: <87d0bhkm6l.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
 micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com>
Cc: 38678@debbugs.gnu.org

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> writes:

> What mess did you do Pierre? :-)
>
> Why are you the author of ee9a735bc8 [1]?

Good question :(  My apologies, it seems that when I resolve the
conflict your authorship was lost in the process.  Sorry about that.

> Why there are lines modified in guix.texi 21f4fbdd84 [2] which are not
> in the original patch [3]?

Hmmm... Looks like Emacs' ws-buttler had a hickup here.  I don't know
why, sorry about that.

=2D-=20
Pierre Neidhardt
https://ambrevar.xyz/

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEUPM+LlsMPZAEJKvom9z0l6S7zH8FAl4i87IACgkQm9z0l6S7
zH+teAgAmyuWwHL+JJJzSHLQaWVqdMXkipyhHsCQez78CSpmtoy/cZ8UxQlk3TC9
+MzD+vGobT7oPs12Ck4C6uOtQNIRjeWjm9OhixR9bvn0xxnTouWENQ0+aHdXKiUm
larYkzcHxmiclQncRT7+s31v08OLqroYgUMzsx3CM1kDFz/cXb29OKuplhq0W7DN
9NA1kn3Q4p1ZP2Q92spXgy2NVOi50SnJ2J6xxCuWNfC7Ab6PmDJl7pFo67zVqTF8
jWvyjl/pygWA7TZhucxyRERdt+3B9J0qZ6qvii/eoMz//663eBLHLUb9mgDlHwzo
y6vN509Hk4rxFhWrhEOOVRglfKvyow==
=IxR/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--