From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41311)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1iyeFc-0003AY-42
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Feb 2020 11:07:05 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1iyeFb-00083L-2u
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Feb 2020 11:07:04 -0500
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:36145)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1iyeFa-00082C-Pa
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Feb 2020 11:07:03 -0500
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1iyeFa-0000ql-Jd
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Feb 2020 11:07:02 -0500
Subject: [bug#39086] [PATCH 3/5] gnu: Add unicode-cldr-common.
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.39086.B39086.15807460173255@debbugs.gnu.org>
References: <20200111120829.29821-1-leo.prikler@student.tugraz.at>
 <20200111120829.29821-3-leo.prikler@student.tugraz.at>
 <87imlbxg7a.fsf@elephly.net>
 <51f014f61bee4c453c50d954b501a3b1dc17370e.camel@student.tugraz.at>
 <87eevyy1g5.fsf@elephly.net>
 <3f376d87e5377a04f460f51257780c2988817ec9.camel@student.tugraz.at>
From: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net>
In-reply-to: <3f376d87e5377a04f460f51257780c2988817ec9.camel@student.tugraz.at>
Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2020 17:06:46 +0100
Message-ID: <87d0avslih.fsf@elephly.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: Leo Prikler <leo.prikler@student.tugraz.at>
Cc: 39086@debbugs.gnu.org


Leo Prikler <leo.prikler@student.tugraz.at> writes:

> Am Freitag, den 17.01.2020, 08:41 +0100 schrieb Ricardo Wurmus:
>> Leo Prikler <leo.prikler@student.tugraz.at> writes:
>>
>> > Am Donnerstag, den 16.01.2020, 22:08 +0100 schrieb Ricardo Wurmus:
>> > > Leo Prikler <leo.prikler@student.tugraz.at> writes:
>> > >
>> > > > * gnu/packages/ibus (unicode-cldr-commmon): New package.
>> > >
>> > > This should be:
>> > >
>> > >     * gnu/packages/ibus.scm (unicode-cldr-commmon): New variable.
>> > >
>> > > You know, I wonder if these things really belong to ibus.scm.  I
>> > > remember a TODO somewhere in the code that bemoaned the lack of
>> > > versioned Unicode data files.  Perhaps we should just add a new
>> > > module
>> > > (gnu packages unicode) =E2=80=94 what do you think?
>> > I don't mind either way, but these packages don't fix the
>> > TODO.  They
>> > add yet unseen features.
>>
>> That=E2=80=99s okay.  I just think we should start that new unicode.scm
>> module
>> to finally have a place for these data files.  That would be a more
>> appropriate place than ibus.scm.
> I agree.  Incidentally, I just coded up a ucd package to use with ibus
> or other packages that need the database.  I copied some of the recipe
> from the gentoo ebuild, specifically the idea to use the zipped
> sources.

Thanks, I just pushed those two patches to the master branch (commit
a9e5e6497a).

--
Ricardo