From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54438) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j7Dxl-000651-3q for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 02:52:06 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j7Dxi-0001Ni-0F for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 02:52:04 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:52662) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j7Dxh-0001Nc-TF for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 02:52:01 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j7Dxh-00079e-R1 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 02:52:01 -0500 Subject: [bug#39798] [PATCH 00/13] Update Pandoc. Resent-Message-ID: From: Pierre Neidhardt In-Reply-To: <87r1yhi5t6.fsf@elephly.net> References: <20200226113442.9798-1-mail@ambrevar.xyz> <87r1yhi5t6.fsf@elephly.net> Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 08:51:43 +0100 Message-ID: <87d0a08o34.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Ricardo Wurmus Cc: 39798@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ricardo Wurmus writes: >> - Should this go on staging? It rebuilds a few hundred packages, maybe = less >> than 300. >> - I'm not 100% sure that updating the Haskell libraries didn't break >> anything. I guess the continuous integration will tell us. >> - 3-4 libraries seemed to have many dependents and updating them would b= reak >> stuff, so instead I created a versioned package, e.g. ghc-regex-base-0= .94. >> Is this OK? Is there a best practice here? > > I would prefer to untangle upgrading any packages from renaming > ghc-pandoc to pandoc. No problem. > Haskell package upgrades need to be consistent according to the current > LTS. We can=E2=80=99t just upgrade some Haskell packages without upgradi= ng them > all. They also cannot be upgraded to the latest version as that may be > higher than the LTS version. I'm new to Haskell packaging. Where do I find the LTS versions? Can we update pandoc then? =2D-=20 Pierre Neidhardt https://ambrevar.xyz/ --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEUPM+LlsMPZAEJKvom9z0l6S7zH8FAl5XdQ8ACgkQm9z0l6S7 zH/b/Af/ULvH8/7qQKoP6lfjI3S30Dc7tn9DWBLk0eGhw1tHhCtrpeyQrTsD1dTJ EE2UISo6cDgIEmJd8iKo2dnw7c2H9CJ5BNRrfaI4wftK4E1xMxVqycGTu+RRsHYj SSCxzK37S/blEDxg3r+CSlbKxIfIurmBSB4mivAgYJsOzfJYdQfhAVJQcUfxh9mF wNanV4I9gD2N12ymYiDSGYi6D+j1XoDmjrZCE+5l1pxZ5St3A2BohxgROPXrjjTn M4dGh6HqDI4zc6kmuf8MyDUBUkzLzWYk8arM7BwY+giEpe14HqM7Y5KOK3moHgDf AUFMDPOJGnfAYZOzv0e1lYyCA5IayA== =GGTN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--