[bug#41455] [PATCH 2/2] gnu: Add python-daemux

[Edouard Klein <edou@rdklein.fr>]

Marius Bakke writes:

> Edouard Klein <edk@beaver-labs.com> writes:
>
>> * gnu/packages/tmux.scm (python-daemux): New variable.
>
> [...]
>   
>> +(define-public python-daemux
>> +  (package
>> +    (name "python-daemux")
>> +    (version "0.1.0")
>> +    (source
>> +     ;; We fetch from the Git repo because there are no tests in the PyPI
>> +     ;; archive.
>> +     (origin
>> +       (method git-fetch)
>> +       (uri (git-reference
>> +             (url "https://github.com/edouardklein/daemux.git")
>> +             (commit "58e30331d3cce08655cb5f55e94396568d484f9a")))
>
> This upstream looks familiar...  Do you think upstream is willing to tag
> a 0.1.0 release instead of using a "magic" commit identifier?  :-)
>

Of course :) 

>> +       (file-name (git-file-name name version))
>> +       (sha256
>> +        (base32 "0cb8v552f2hkwz6d3hwsmrz3gd28jikga3lcc3r1zlw8ra7804ph"))))
>> +    (build-system python-build-system)
>> +    (arguments
>> +     `(#:phases (modify-phases %standard-phases
>> +                  (replace 'check
>> +                    (lambda _
>> +                      (mkdir-p "tmptmux")
>> +                      (setenv "TMUX_TMPDIR" (string-append (getcwd) "/tmptmux"))
>> +                      (invoke "tmux" "new-session" "-d")
>> +                      (invoke "make" "test"))))))
>
> Nice!  I guess 'tmux' needs to be a native-input if we don't propagate
> it from libtmux.
>

I'm not sure what you mean. tmux is indeed a propagated input of
python-libtmux, which is in turn a propagated input of python-daemux. Do
you mean that it should be added explicitly here instead of being
implicit ?


>> +    (propagated-inputs
>> +     `(("python-libtmux" ,python-libtmux)))
>> +    (native-inputs
>> +     `(("python-coverage" ,python-coverage)
>> +       ("python-sphinx" ,python-sphinx)))
>> +    (home-page "https://github.com/edouardklein/daemux")
>> +    (synopsis
>> +     "Start, stop, restart and check daemons via tmux")
>
> This line break is unnecessary.
>
> Otherwise LGTM, thanks!

Cool ! Thank you for reviewing.