From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp11.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms5.migadu.com with LMTPS id AIPBM6WmuGPuGwAAbAwnHQ (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 06 Jan 2023 23:54:29 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp11.migadu.com with LMTPS id sCrEM6WmuGORzgAA9RJhRA (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 06 Jan 2023 23:54:29 +0100 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A983728B5 for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2023 23:54:29 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pDvbC-0001Yd-Ah; Fri, 06 Jan 2023 17:54:06 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pDvb9-0001YB-He for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Jan 2023 17:54:03 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pDvb8-0008Gw-P0 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Jan 2023 17:54:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pDvb8-0006Qr-6v for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Jan 2023 17:54:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#59822] [PATCH guix-artwork] website: base: home: Add 'DOWNLOAD LATEST' button. Resent-From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2023 22:54:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 59822 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: zimoun Cc: "\(" , "pelzflorian \(Florian Pelz\)" , 59822@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 59822-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B59822.167304563224710 (code B ref 59822); Fri, 06 Jan 2023 22:54:02 +0000 Received: (at 59822) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Jan 2023 22:53:52 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56021 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pDvax-0006QT-T5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 Jan 2023 17:53:52 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:50526) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pDvav-0006QG-OC for 59822@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 Jan 2023 17:53:50 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pDvap-0008FJ-BE; Fri, 06 Jan 2023 17:53:43 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:To: From; bh=nb4KPKp+ax15LIiAxCtmlp2fwbAwRpNCIpAc5+SSz6Q=; b=ZV6XV4mqAXY4MdcLWSbq pyC8rJO6Vi3kCW+o/YPEJqV8QABK6M0XRoiQw2QFQ7ACF9HEpNofbWgEbVBZmCj0HMtNzFhW3iKMC 2LipZs0TZ0WEma1LQrdzhLKnCjTxeEahHOUgCr/H1kqWDrCaZ5g2h+9O4ZxWggs6B4bO6bDZVqneo J6vLmLYhXluF7zzKOQD9A6WyrTohsQau3UbP+rzMdE/qVrHIGVOgbft0SCWtYiDZM1qHKyxZYOUqG 4rN+fk7NmxHg2eGQWz8na1xTTxo28btHO6msC7S0cZbz+bnptGdcRkPzcLBS2LF1zvkTLgw3f5Mh8 PTi+wIGcJzUkGw==; Received: from 91-160-117-201.subs.proxad.net ([91.160.117.201] helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pDvao-0000Pr-RS; Fri, 06 Jan 2023 17:53:43 -0500 From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= References: <20221204195007.20997-1-paren@disroot.org> <87edterg7x.fsf@pelzflorian.de> <87a642rfui.fsf@pelzflorian.de> <875yeqrfmz.fsf@pelzflorian.de> <878rjm9t5l.fsf@pelzflorian.de> <87y1rhzvxz.fsf@pelzflorian.de> <86y1rhg412.fsf@gmail.com> <87r0ws50yl.fsf_-_@gnu.org> <87pmc1kroh.fsf@gmail.com> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: Septidi 17 =?UTF-8?Q?Niv=C3=B4se?= an 231 de la =?UTF-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution,?= jour de la Marne X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2023 23:53:40 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87pmc1kroh.fsf@gmail.com> (zimoun's message of "Fri, 30 Dec 2022 13:21:50 +0100") Message-ID: <87cz7rxojv.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1673045669; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=Yov7xVCQYMfHGZjQhiOoNmgAX9L2lqTSCGZJYfZlhYouuSg4EClbo1P/EwowwgNnWOooRt i1TqnEtZrMAxiH1Q910RI0Ic0kvF2Sar7OEJYDTkjXPbRukC50OQqNAmmd6vS2pvyCtfQ2 TOqV4Vle4drTe6AKo4tlZnxKejN0I7G0LW4hd6EJbogeNZmogHuCo1kctKJmTlLKFqiRVo bQq3GxJBd+1s6LHpaDDaT28c1CGgp4+rCO2DUYvlqdfRdUg/zZ8IMStW+U+R4p41ImRCyp zWQZM4podsXG3ITuiQLVTh9pf7MVie6HoNH/E1BSTzu8OKV0BRPOqVklYRHyMg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gnu.org header.s=fencepost-gnu-org header.b=ZV6XV4mq; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1673045669; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=nb4KPKp+ax15LIiAxCtmlp2fwbAwRpNCIpAc5+SSz6Q=; b=IlWmARZNoOMiJXhxUbxxM+7vei7+cTey/zqbrE33/7vFsg6FNTm4fkTsIhdYwFWiMeju99 4qhUhzgTrLBejEDC1MDqMqP2n5noZVCGkpS+NArW3UH8DYf1xsH88dkgkWIsDP7Hps5LHl ofjyuBq/nJjET6rSTVKOq7W/PtNrijvXYfRJIys5GO286zHlPYUcsjWsz0NwAl6kwCJ+r5 1C3f/FoGziE2Rm92YUBjhV5lQsK7oNUzSF/6Dyp7BCglVDV+ESMH0g6CH6NNkvDggKIpQY kXAfWU0Pp2+GB2hMK4LRYyNR5Scdxc5P6untvLkxXLM37O0ShuJPwFxZihChpg== X-Spam-Score: -3.06 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: A983728B5 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gnu.org header.s=fencepost-gnu-org header.b=ZV6XV4mq; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -3.06 X-TUID: jwiaRCzNIhGx Hello! zimoun skribis: > On Wed, 21 Dec 2022 at 14:40, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: >> zimoun skribis: >> >>> The front page contains the explicit version >>> number with the button =C2=ABDownload v1.3.0=C2=BB. Why not, just remo= ve this >>> version label and just have the button =C2=ABDownload=C2=BB? >> >> Because people would be downloading the snapshot of the day, for which >> we haven=E2=80=99t done as much testing as during a regular release proc= ess. > > I do not see why just the button =C2=ABDownload=C2=BB instead of the butt= on > =C2=ABDownload v1.4.0=C2=BB would lead to people downloading something el= se than > the link, i.e., the webpage named . Oh sorry, I had totally misunderstood. :-) No strong opinion about whether or not to keep =E2=80=9Cv1.4.0=E2=80=9D on = the button. It nobody objects, we can apply those patches. "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" skribis: > Making latest more discoverable would be unlikely to make it used > exactly by the select few in need of its features. > > Probably we better remove latest from the top menu? > > I wouldn=E2=80=99t want newcomers to go for latest because hey, it=E2=80= =99s displayed > prominently and newer. The installation routine for the latest > installer image also may break. Or after installation, some software is > broken. Which would mean the initial install is broken, and no > roll-back is available. Yes, I agree. But then, where would you put the link to /latest? Or maybe we can keep it in the menu but add a prominent warning on the page stating that these are snapshots that haven=E2=80=99t seen as much QA? Ludo=E2=80=99.