From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34108) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d8Ks0-0002fb-Ba for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 10 May 2017 02:13:09 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d8Kru-000409-IQ for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 10 May 2017 02:13:08 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:60469) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d8Kru-000405-FO for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 10 May 2017 02:13:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d8Kru-0002jn-B8 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 10 May 2017 02:13:02 -0400 Subject: bug#25879: [PATCH] gnu: Add LLVM and CLANG 3.9.1. Resent-Message-ID: References: <87shn12p2i.fsf@gnu.org> <87k28180ob.fsf@gnu.org> <87d1dskjdh.fsf@gnu.org> <8737eosvgb.fsf@gnu.org> <20170307212411.GA29363@mail.thebird.nl> From: Ricardo Wurmus In-reply-to: <20170307212411.GA29363@mail.thebird.nl> Date: Wed, 10 May 2017 08:11:52 +0200 Message-ID: <87bmr1i6l3.fsf@elephly.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Pjotr Prins Cc: 25879@debbugs.gnu.org Pjotr Prins writes: > On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 09:06:28PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote: >> > Well, actually, this is just the latest release, so maybe I should >> > update the 3.8.1 recipe to3.9.1 instead. WDYT? >> >> If the other users of LLVM and Clang (as per ‘guix refresh -l llvm’) can >> cope with it, upgrading sounds better indeed. Could you check if that >> is the case? > > With LLVM it is probably a good idea to keep the major versions as > packages tend to lag after latest. Many compiler writers are a bit > behind and sometimes people want to use older compilers (like with > Julia). I agree. @Roel: I see that this patch hasn’t been pushed yet. Is there anything missing or was it just forgotten? -- Ricardo GPG: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC https://elephly.net