bug#26803: [PATCH 25/36] gnu: Add java-guava.

[Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net>]

Roel Janssen <roel@gnu.org> writes:

> Ricardo Wurmus writes:
>
>> * gnu/packages/java.scm (java-guava): New variable.
>> ---
>>  gnu/packages/java.scm | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 52 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/gnu/packages/java.scm b/gnu/packages/java.scm
>> index 3a104f4c5..a9faf681d 100644
>> --- a/gnu/packages/java.scm
>> +++ b/gnu/packages/java.scm
>> @@ -1878,6 +1878,58 @@ included:
>>  It provides packages in the @code{javax.annotations} namespace.")
>>      (license license:asl2.0)))
>>  
>> +(define-public java-guava
>> +  (package
>> +    (name "java-guava")
>> +    ;; This is the last release of Guava that can be built with Java 7.
>> +    (version "20.0")
>> +    (source (origin
>> +              (method url-fetch)
>> +              (uri (string-append "https://github.com/google/guava/"
>> +                                  "releases/download/v" version
>> +                                  "/guava-" version "-sources.jar"))
>> +              (sha256
>> +               (base32
>> +                "1gawrs5gi6j5hcfxdgpnfli75vb9pfi4sn09pnc8xacr669yajwr"))))
>> +    (build-system ant-build-system)
>> +    (arguments
>> +     `(#:tests? #f                      ; no tests included
>
> Not really important.  But should we indent the comments this way?

This is what Emacs does when indenting the whole expression.  I have no
preference either way, so I left it.

-- 
Ricardo

GPG: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6  2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC
https://elephly.net