From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57226) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eqquc-0001xC-3g for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 20:52:07 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eqquZ-0004i5-Hw for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 20:52:06 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:56623) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eqquZ-0004i1-EK for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 20:52:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eqquZ-0004WB-7R for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 20:52:03 -0500 Subject: bug#29820: [PATCH] services: cgit: Add more configuration fields. Resent-To: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Message-ID: From: Oleg Pykhalov References: <87incy9yv6.fsf@gmail.com> <87h8sdb6qa.fsf@lassieur.org> <87po6yu7h9.fsf@gmail.com> <871sjdz8ca.fsf@lassieur.org> <87r2q6zp2l.fsf@gmail.com> <87h8q6at2i.fsf@lassieur.org> <87muzxej3o.fsf@gmail.com> <87efl9beff.fsf@lassieur.org> <871sh6z6o0.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2018 04:50:55 +0300 In-Reply-To: <871sh6z6o0.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic \=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\= \=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Tue, 27 Feb 2018 18:25:19 +0100") Message-ID: <87bmg9hog0.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 29820@debbugs.gnu.org, 29820-done@debbugs.gnu.org, =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Lassieur --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello Ludovic, Thank you for a vote in this discussion! ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: > Cl=C3=A9ment Lassieur skribis: > >> Clearly they acknowledge that Git is capitalized (because upstream >> decided so), but cgit is not. >> >> So I think we should not capitalize it :-) > > Agreed. (Though again we should not lose our hair over it. :-)) OK. Pushed as e1cf4fd2d2fc0aab0f91c8ac961a8134cbefe200 I'll close the bug report. Oleg. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEc+OyAXw1EaDPCmAPckbhHGm3lWkFAlqWCv8ACgkQckbhHGm3 lWkH/w/+NodKiuQR5SxRjNTjrkENSE1s4SKsQHXYteqADmQ9rus+N9JxXSOA+LYg li4bk56vRT45KEvWvSzfSkxbVmVCF2yGiqqGRYSxjQm8LzUaeX/gJMqrgbY4vWK/ i78j67ZdCPFhI7pGsJOsI9PyIrvo1IjTghqx/9RifUmiFJ8+1IfJGc/LhW4sA58q GlEAVZj7g6WHA1IGj7GLsn3P9s2fNrTwWbhtwV70qOmJ9eSHXWbhTXw7F9sqBaWX DThN7u2nr0ccx7N3nhfRHm1dxo3xXyvDCSNrRvauBoL5ab29nKmpO1695kch4Oqt uBr3rujjWlA9nfP2aVi/wzmz49Uepae7MaRMmTxzVipeqnp8kbZlRJ4liLwujkIH ta/CkAfZZ886NDrVB0qKS/5B2l+NygZSH1v6PwKUcMYXWb7yhbsCnsvypHhTEdoM oFHQEpet85biuYc1HXShsjQ6DJgwwGLXCXrUCTTXWonxtgSUGzfgUD3dIKFAJZhH I7vAJq0U2nhZdHDt56BUbJ50Xey68dFz2p6N1Djtp6l38W9ftBDk641+NQiLE1nO VxiJ+Jpbuv8f1n6BhuMyiQMDnNHCd/bivFO2ZQX38Wn2joDKmaPd9RwBcV1eF3E0 hXoIaVxQe+0fsicjdK0+YRBOdPZbw3zjs5q1Iaq7e+P155OJbxw= =j42E -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--