From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43104) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ezIuh-00064U-IN for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Mar 2018 05:23:08 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ezIue-0005Wr-Uc for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Mar 2018 05:23:07 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:40775) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ezIue-0005Wn-Qj for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Mar 2018 05:23:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ezIuc-0002CE-Ew for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Mar 2018 05:23:02 -0400 Subject: [bug#30734] [PATCH core-updates 3/3] gnu: net-tools: Don't install 'ifconfig'. Resent-Message-ID: From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) References: <20180306165642.4486-1-mbakke@fastmail.com> <20180306165642.4486-3-mbakke@fastmail.com> <87zi3jporb.fsf@gnu.org> <87woym70ue.fsf@fastmail.com> <87fu5al261.fsf@gnu.org> <87d0zwkl7l.fsf@fastmail.com> Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2018 10:22:36 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87d0zwkl7l.fsf@fastmail.com> (Marius Bakke's message of "Thu, 22 Mar 2018 19:40:30 +0100") Message-ID: <87bmffkuxv.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Marius Bakke Cc: 30734@debbugs.gnu.org Marius Bakke skribis: > Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: [...] >> Sure, either that or rename it to =E2=80=9Cifconfig.net-tools=E2=80=9D (= I think Debian >> sometimes does things like this.) >> >> But, isc-dhcp depends on net-tools, and it might have scripts that >> depend on its ifconfig, for instance. Same for virtuoso-ose, isc-bind, >> iodine, and more. >> >> So all in all, your suggestion may be safer, though we should check >> whether these things break. > > I like renaming it better than moving to 'sbin'. I'll try out some of > the dependent packages and see what needs to be done. Would it be okay > to switch to GNU Inetutils for those that require 'ifconfig'? Sure. I think we=E2=80=99ll have to actually run the those tools (isc-dhcp, etc.) to check whether their scripts work well with GNU ifconfig, though. Ludo=E2=80=99.