From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55309) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fG2d4-0008RA-3k for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 08 May 2018 09:26:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fG2d0-0007tG-6H for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 08 May 2018 09:26:06 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:45697) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fG2d0-0007t8-2G for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 08 May 2018 09:26:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fG2cz-0004xI-Rx for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 08 May 2018 09:26:01 -0400 Subject: [bug#31342] [PATCH 2/2] gnu: services: Add Enlightenment desktop service. Resent-Message-ID: From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) References: <20180502164723.13994-1-efraim@flashner.co.il> <20180502164723.13994-2-efraim@flashner.co.il> <87bmdr5s2g.fsf@gnu.org> <20180507190327.GA2707@macbook41> Date: Tue, 08 May 2018 15:24:59 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20180507190327.GA2707@macbook41> (Efraim Flashner's message of "Mon, 7 May 2018 22:03:27 +0300") Message-ID: <87bmdq46vo.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Efraim Flashner Cc: 31342@debbugs.gnu.org Hello! Efraim Flashner skribis: > On Mon, May 07, 2018 at 06:49:43PM +0200, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: [...] >> Perhaps enlightenment_ckpasswd needs a PAM entry as well, like >> =E2=80=98screen-locker-service-type=E2=80=99 does? >>=20 > > I'm not sure, enlightenment's screen locker code was refactored in > 0.22.2 so that it would behave identically on Linux and BSD, and I'm not > sure that the BSDs use PAM, and it seems to with as-is. If you confirm it works as-is, that=E2=80=99s fine! >> > +(define* (enlightenment-desktop-service >> > + #:key (config (enlightenment-desktop-configuration))) >> > + "Return a service that adds the @code{enlightenment} package to the= system >> > +profile, and extends dbus with the ability for @code{efl} to generate >> > +thumbnails and makes setuid the programs which enlightenment expects = to have >> > +their setuid bit set." >> > + (service enlightenment-desktop-service-type config)) >>=20 >> Not needed! :-) >>=20 >> Thank you, >> Ludo=E2=80=99. > > I looked at the xfce service especially, and it actually has the same > fields and declarations as enlightenment. Sounds good. > I'd like to leave the option in place to add > '(enlightenment-desktop-service)' to an OS-config since it is then > identical to the other desktop services we have. This style has been (informally, I admit) deprecated since we introduced the =E2=80=98service=E2=80=99 form. The recommended way is to write: (service enlightenment-service-type) I agree it=E2=80=99s slightly more verbose, but it=E2=80=99s more =E2=80=9C= transparent.=E2=80=9D Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.