From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46368) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ftLu1-0000jn-HE for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Aug 2018 19:54:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ftLty-0001ct-4x for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Aug 2018 19:54:05 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:55060) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ftLtx-0001cQ-TL for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Aug 2018 19:54:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ftLtx-0007tT-N0 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Aug 2018 19:54:01 -0400 Subject: [bug#32517] [PATCH 0/7] Fix git-annex dependencies. Resent-Message-ID: From: Timothy Sample References: <87a7pc31jz.fsf@ngyro.com> <20180824220145.GA1954@jasmine.lan> Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2018 19:53:31 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20180824220145.GA1954@jasmine.lan> (Leo Famulari's message of "Fri, 24 Aug 2018 18:01:45 -0400") Message-ID: <87bm9r8gp0.fsf@ngyro.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Leo Famulari Cc: 32517@debbugs.gnu.org Hi Leo, Leo Famulari writes: > On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 11:07:12PM -0400, Timothy Sample wrote: >> Hi Guix, >>=20 >> This patch fixes several Haskell packages needed for building git-annex. >> Mostly the packages are updated to work with our new versions of >> ghc-conduit and ghc-resourcet. > > Thanks! Can you clarify if git-annex is supposed to build with these > patches? > > I applied them on recent master branch and tried building git-annex but > ghc-aeson fails to build. Yes! I noticed this earlier today. I made the patches before Arun updated darcs and all of its dependencies. One of the updated packages is ghc-base-compat, which is now too new for ghc-aeson. Unfortunately, if we update ghc-aeson, we need to update ghc-text, which has around 300 dependencies. I=E2=80=99m not sure how to proceed here. The patches up to= (but excluding) ghc-persistent should be fine IIRC. I didn=E2=80=99t look very closely into Arun=E2=80=99s changes to see if we= could find a set of mutually agreeable versions. To do so would involve downgrading packages that Arun changed, which seems undesirable. Ricardo mentioned on IRC that we should try and update all of our packages to the recent LTS versions, which would be ideal here. The blocker is getting GHC 8.4.3 to work (which I am working on). Maybe this patch series should just be rejected for now. Thank you for reviewing! -- Tim