From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55994)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1itbYr-0005Z1-SJ
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 13:14:09 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1itbYo-0005Zj-93
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 13:14:05 -0500
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:40038)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1itbYo-0005Zf-5v
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 13:14:02 -0500
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1itbYn-0005Yf-Ux
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 13:14:01 -0500
Subject: [bug#38678] Command line option in addition to GUIX_PACKAGE_PATH -
 Reason?
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.38678.B38678.157954398121265@debbugs.gnu.org>
From: Pierre Neidhardt <mail@ambrevar.xyz>
In-Reply-To: <CAJ3okZ1V0-jnDW7S9Ay6=pM0YG-s==-Pec1=Ffe4JSucGaEHNw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <87pnglj2ka.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
 <CAJ3okZ3X5DZ3DVDXY5_WHEOzL01=nJGkJeBHZxL-1eLS3x8c8g@mail.gmail.com>
 <87sglgsiey.fsf@lassieur.org> <878sn8inru.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
 <87o8w4mewg.fsf@gnu.org> <87tv5wfdrm.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
 <CAJ3okZ0_5AB57FgNyagAA-KCOW=o7AgDrr4v5p8n4XvEmJH7=g@mail.gmail.com>
 <87lfr8fd9u.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <20191226213108.753f8ab7@scratchpost.org>
 <CAJ3okZ2HSh_WbiWEz65-A_LZLgN91Dc-rAQe_7PbA09YQid64Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <87blr3eao0.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
 <CAJ3okZ3G5YteTpMJdsfUHHp=LrzZ593OrZAaupk=x7bp3CZ-3Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <87ftge13h5.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
 <CAJ3okZ0UpdL-u4mayy8iLtaKK72VSHd2YkTu1FY8NYj6Pi=4AA@mail.gmail.com>
 <87y2u6yqat.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
 <CAJ3okZ3xqX=E8=i9Yhw01HYzx5Ry8irLOT2z=j2ryonnoL=h4Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <87d0bhkm6l.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
 <CAJ3okZ1V0-jnDW7S9Ay6=pM0YG-s==-Pec1=Ffe4JSucGaEHNw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2020 19:12:48 +0100
Message-ID: <87blqyro7z.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
 micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com>
Cc: 38678@debbugs.gnu.org

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> writes:

> What I do not understand is: why 'ws-buttler' had a hiccup? Did you
> modify my patch? I mean ws-buttler generally works by hooking
> (before-save-hook), therefore to have a hiccup, 'ws-buttler' needed a
> modification then a save, right? Why?

I think this happened when I resolved the conflict (with Ediff).

> Thank you for reviewing and pushing.
> I will remind that you owe me 2 belgian beers. ;-)

Stella Artois? :D

=2D-=20
Pierre Neidhardt
https://ambrevar.xyz/

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEUPM+LlsMPZAEJKvom9z0l6S7zH8FAl4l7aAACgkQm9z0l6S7
zH/UaQf/dOoKD/01JF68mvLrqI3ZZaXZToQU0mBfwl4fYv2TZ1aXs6jtunKU4cqM
+4sBIjGC1b6TpAvgSPLUYg2CzAUfL8zr4yYZ+NP0Pjqb8rWE3j1GV/Z0KO+OLjWN
65x4wl3Cfx68aMtazck5R0mTE3LTLFv2pIVTPP53WKhl/B+1gmSGywgD9UvJL01i
BMIL5B2J3ZJJsgXmpiLhKvmp+hyUc8rFmKCTTu1Je8O3nzotDVUGFC1t7ZbxF3eZ
/2MWmKs5VOTyFJKugrG2/580zM5PCOmqxKcKzFhbcLUp2HiGFf8R/ojZyykTMYGY
EFQ5uHckEL9jFk4h0X6U9QgPZCqxIg==
=NliU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--