From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54906) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j2whv-000262-Q9 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Feb 2020 07:38:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j2whu-0003Rw-Jx for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Feb 2020 07:38:03 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:57341) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j2whu-0003Rh-7e for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Feb 2020 07:38:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j2whu-00081F-4y for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Feb 2020 07:38:02 -0500 Subject: [bug#39514] [PATCH] update radare2 and cutter versions Resent-Message-ID: References: In-reply-to: Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2020 13:38:15 +0100 Message-ID: <87blq0gh54.fsf@nckx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" Reply-to: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice , Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Guix-patches From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Guix-patches via To: pinoaffe@airmail.cc, 39514@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Pinoaffe, pinoaffe@airmail.cc =E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A > update radare2 and cutter, they need to be updated at the same=20 > time > since old cutter doesn't build with new radare2 and new cutter=20 > doesn't > build with old radare2 This is a good reason not to separate the two, although I'm unsure=20 what the commit message would look like. > - (version "3.5.1") > + (version "4.2.1") Confusingly, their =E2=80=98releases=E2=80=99 page[0] lists 4.2.0 as =E2=80= =98Latest=20 release=E2=80=99. As GitHub actively encourages poor release management=20 this might just be an oversight, but it would be nice if this were=20 clarified. Is 4.2.1 generally accepted as the current stable=20 release? > + (file-name (string-append name "-" version=20 > "-checkout")) There's a (git-file-name name version) helper that will do the=20 same thing, prettier. > (description > - "Radare project started as a forensics tool, a scriptable > commandline > + "Radare project started as a forensics tool, a scriptable I'm going to improve the radare2 description on master so this=20 hunk can be dropped. Would you be willing to send a V2 patch to this bug number (and=20 think of a good commit message following our standards[1])?=20=20 Kind regards, T G-R [0]: https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/releasesu [1]: https://guix.gnu.org/manual/en/guix.html#Submitting-Patches --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEfo+u0AlEeO9y5k0W2Imw8BjFSTwFAl5H5jcACgkQ2Imw8BjF STw8ng//Q4tjKgP9iooHdG6OSsgAZ08lZXaJfuR6nnkdcAmQLYWA8vqDvQbiCpep 0E0xWJ85IH2q+RhSAHFyRVDVYq/Bqp6/Hd5c/4wNAVJuQZ8qgHlLy9X5Gfxr8afn 46V56rqJVZs4ludKrhReHObRh9MHPvXVbK7vVl043BPeMu/0riyMkuYlqgdnPD2P rfFAKf/6btqwsuz/O+elJXEuQDn186QX/ElzJr6e7jmlFPpacp6/8iZOTJ1F5o0y He+d99kvSqAxtVTWb7dWBoNlpHR+BppfTuHl7kxJR809S3/7fOEIs6V/pn8MFG+t cJIJbcQUyCg+GjyxxOypEPr6lQ4nIFFVyiIkl905S+mlIqAwTe/KgFlqyx7oMLO8 kiQx+dMXexFNFTwFNgGYcJ9ppgc1BgfYqM8ufhc1ih7G1nNq4dhGPNfw086oYI2X Q7MLHzcQTk3xMOj+dEsCVj9BwgHtlD4UrcZRI9N7e7ZFZe0OpsH8uH/TdOWv5u+b J/yT8uqfN2oSDi8Kd6tiKmGtHqT/3P6pdxV678IWFFua1my/bYhjHYPnhLNu4cIT XAFhaHaf6OEN5EkqENu5eyIXENb4dRtf8S/9J7hyPGB8FT4VM8CmOKttnDVligG+ 6m5HJOpDcr6FeW1A2c/eRx1ptJ5szS2IFEK2p6RVKAhGLprNEvE= =zUXp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--