david larsson <david.larsson@selfhosted.xyz> skriver:

> On 2021-05-13 14:41, Marius Bakke wrote:
>> david larsson <david.larsson@selfhosted.xyz> skriver:
>> 
>> Will adding it as a separate package be sufficient?  We could call it
>> "xmllint-xpath0" or similar and make it clear that it's just libxml2
>> with a patched xmllint in the description.
>> 
>> Thoughts?
>
> Yes, that would be nice. How about calling it libxml2-xpath0 instead? 
> That would maintain libxml2 in the name, letting users know it's just a 
> version of the original package and should show up when searching for 
> libxml2. If calling it xmllint-xpath0, I feel that the package should 
> remove other outputs than just the xmllint binary file, which is perhaps 
> a good idea though?

libxml2-xpath0 is probably better indeed, I don't have a strong opinion.
Can you send an updated patch?  :-)

Thanks,
Marius