From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp10.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id OEdPJ01qWGIlYQAAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 14 Apr 2022 20:39:09 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp10.migadu.com with LMTPS id 6HYSIE1qWGJ7OQEAG6o9tA (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 14 Apr 2022 20:39:09 +0200 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 135CB141C3 for ; Thu, 14 Apr 2022 20:39:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:40234 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nf4N1-0002aI-QU for larch@yhetil.org; Thu, 14 Apr 2022 14:39:07 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37798) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nf4Mw-0002YQ-8b for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Apr 2022 14:39:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:35240) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nf4Mv-0003bK-Vm for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Apr 2022 14:39:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nf4Mv-000845-Th for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Apr 2022 14:39:01 -0400 Subject: bug#54938: Fw: Re: [bug#54938] [PATCH] gnu: sbcl-py4cl: Update to 0.0.0-1.2f2a008. Resent-From: Guillaume Le Vaillant Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-To: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2022 18:39:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 54938 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: "Paul A. Patience" Cc: 54938-done@debbugs.gnu.org Mail-Followup-To: 54938@debbugs.gnu.org, glv@posteo.net, paul@apatience.com Received: via spool by 54938-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D54938.164996148530915 (code D ref 54938); Thu, 14 Apr 2022 18:39:01 +0000 Received: (at 54938-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Apr 2022 18:38:05 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57370 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nf4M1-00082Z-CX for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 14 Apr 2022 14:38:05 -0400 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]:37283) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nf4Lz-000820-BR for 54938-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 14 Apr 2022 14:38:04 -0400 Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 278F1240109 for <54938-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 14 Apr 2022 20:37:56 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1649961477; bh=MsYcwT3OILhqFsUtYfjw+qwQW28cFzWiQ8W8FlAR6gg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=fl6bKlo7x5Wn+ZqOI/d8wFlHDB+MSMOwayHGr00epYHmRH9qHStSgd2A0QPeA1S7S 07pAiwI3luTyfKWsQuX8qabevNoJHqzDB9TvZCYn+J/x3iin33WV3nvsV7Ie0SptoY 7NskcNVq+QrAeOVEJdHITiu4pFjqPI5efK2EdQrnl8O7wxtghyh++fRP7D0oKd0RcD I+v/8V5LY5ZTNXVwog2v4j1AnSu5GpQkOZDFjbe5XYhhB2LldMGQN0/5OjKBAEbKAE KXW47VlW1/bnxFgqCaUP4qY6g50YXS1joFNEiUH2+y0iO52sNiCQ/YqA8kbCV+Wtvc f4LgDEoOFxNqA== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4KfSrN2kmTz9rxK; Thu, 14 Apr 2022 20:37:55 +0200 (CEST) References: <20220414140746.34334-1-paul@apatience.com> <87fsmfbugj.fsf@kitej> <-pXFOD8i64LooBxxS-zlALDS97M9U1WyY-kCqpvFQL7WDDO2IKPofQy8PJdzmRlGObTocXAEtgXVgIihw3ugR49OiwS5qZOO-Ez9OKHYynA=@apatience.com> From: Guillaume Le Vaillant Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2022 18:35:00 +0000 In-reply-to: Message-ID: <87bkx3bjek.fsf@kitej> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-To: larch@yhetil.org X-Migadu-Country: US ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1649961549; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:resent-to:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references: list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post: dkim-signature; bh=MsYcwT3OILhqFsUtYfjw+qwQW28cFzWiQ8W8FlAR6gg=; b=cLNrFRJnlHvTWlTLzi/jO4Zr3ZYNlO9clemVQoiSnEHg/5CVoGoQTrg9pPABaWyPXoLOzx OzUBFLdndOAfCxXyiaDm9F/G0uG2f0r8ji+KRLQTVkWyOFaWbrtOc1UaVPlimKJOhUQDsO KscVsFA0FQRZdSlvDjh/AW7xemC+T/Zl8Fr6FbN9grAyQarlTuwinxST49tnVL1cl9+HZY hAgGmqpmR90iMKzHnYtBG9cB5pWa2nvLrolF2ng0GbBRvkrTOXHKsodY/6RQzIiagInUnH 1OIO0XRdQRyG6WzEmwNuCMY3omWgwTWRjFml2JZ8r9n3Mp8WvqOMbM0yb7jNjw== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1649961549; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=K/AxpG1ZJa7wmu1d65PB/9QRRUFStjQpQi6mqBMU3ewpm9agDOvP8yugiYWirnKlBNSSpl scOP1kRFflJJVgGLLtBXEloo7z6tZRcApxvWjLTBoJKL6M6s+ZCCLwfwqXlB5wrGtNu/uQ ne0Oy0RrgzELGzsZFc25Y8IwhBZZmDKkwNmSQ3DP5K4E/PlFa6+iJ8OF8ara+Y/IHzJwwu AN34X7c9ATD73vHWrXlkL3FxRSD4Q/OZRhnXOjWW5oIqCFl1DjRh+HmA+3Kp5BU1hflPIj ODTdw0MuvvrrHJqN1f5DcV0ui/It1Op7TfIssQvJ9IMismbNefN3KH9179Qs0w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b=fl6bKlo7; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (strict)" header.from=posteo.net (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Spam-Score: 4.16 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b=fl6bKlo7; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (strict)" header.from=posteo.net (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 135CB141C3 X-Spam-Score: 4.16 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: Ltwjgs4S+xl5 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain "Paul A. Patience" skribis: > (Forwarding my message since I accidentally didn't include 54938@debbugs.gnu.org > in the "to" field.) > > On Thursday, April 14th, 2022 at 13:14, Paul A. Patience wrote: >> On Thursday, April 14th, 2022 at 10:36, Guillaume Le Vaillant glv@posteo.net wrote: >>> Is there a reason to update only to commit 2f2a008 from September 2019 >>> instead of a more recent one? >> >> The latest commit (from February 2021) has several issues originating from >> the backports from digikar99's py4cl2 package. >> For example, the py-cd function does not follow the naming scheme of py4cl, >> and also calls the inexistent pycall function (pycall is py4cl2's equivalent >> of py4cl's python-call). >> >> Further, a configuration file was introduced to configure several things, >> including the path to python and some configuration variables related to >> numpy array pickling. >> The problem is the configuration file has to be located in the same >> (writable) directory as py4cl.py, which of course causes problems with Guix. >> Technically this isn't an issue because Guix hardcodes the path to py4cl.py, >> so we could reuse *base-directory* for just the configuration file, but I think >> a better solution would be to put the configuration file into XDG_CONFIG_HOME, >> and that is probably better fixed at the source rather than in the Guix package. >> >> The test suite fails as well, perhaps due to the configuration file not being >> writable. >> I didn't investigate very much. >> >> I may submit some fixes to py4cl in the future for the issues I mentioned, >> but only if I keep using it (at the moment I am evaluating its suitability). >> Until then, the commit I've updated sbcl-py4cl to is the last before the first >> of digikar99's changes were merged. >> >> Best regards, >> Paul Ok, thanks for the explanation. Patch pushed as 5059e7f01e1d299a2a52b1649251fa49f1992385. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iIUEAREKAC0WIQTLxZxm7Ce5cXlAaz5r6CCK3yH+PwUCYlhqAw8cZ2x2QHBvc3Rl by5uZXQACgkQa+ggit8h/j/87AD/Sq8F/HfOLS7jIluP2JMzGPnl1b7FrIQ1hsJg YJgDDM4A+gIJnA1y/786A6u9IVJ5EBjCaVcPZoa+sEkowykAfQdA =8Kx4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--