From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39570)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1e6LXb-0007vk-Pv
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Oct 2017 15:04:08 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1e6LXW-00015g-IO
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Oct 2017 15:04:07 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:47533)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1e6LXW-00015a-Ef
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Oct 2017 15:04:02 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1e6LXW-0000Kb-5k
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Oct 2017 15:04:02 -0400
Subject: [bug#28690] provide a lib output for boost
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.28690.B28690.15086989941205@debbugs.gnu.org>
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
References: <874lr6w02b.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87shefmmm1.fsf@albion.it.manchester.ac.uk> <87infauga6.fsf@gnu.org>
	<20171020.152141.705942693700447320.post@thomasdanckaert.be>
	<87o9p1u78l.fsf@gnu.org> <87zi8ji0sw.fsf@albion.it.manchester.ac.uk>
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2017 12:03:06 -0700
In-Reply-To: <87zi8ji0sw.fsf@albion.it.manchester.ac.uk> (Dave Love's message
	of "Sun, 22 Oct 2017 17:50:55 +0100")
Message-ID: <87a80j0zv9.fsf@gnu.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
	<mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
	<mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: Dave Love <dave.love@manchester.ac.uk>
Cc: 28690@debbugs.gnu.org, Thomas Danckaert <post@thomasdanckaert.be>

Dave Love <dave.love@manchester.ac.uk> skribis:

> Ludovic Court=C3=A8s <ludo@gnu.org> writes:
>
>>> I'm happy to push this to core-updates.  What do we do with packages
>>> requiring boost:lib?   Do we just wait and see which builds fail on
>>> core-updates, and add `("boost" ,boost "lib") as an input where
>>> required?
>>
>> It would be ideal to identify them by building (some of) Boost=E2=80=99s=
 direct
>> dependencies.  This can be done on master to avoid rebuilding the world,
>> and then pushed to core-updates.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Ludo=E2=80=99.
>
> I don't know if it helps, or is well-known anyhow, but you can check the
> dependencies of any that are in Debian by looking under
> https://packages.debian.org/sid/<package>.

I don=E2=80=99t think it helps.  I suggest looking for the direct dependenc=
ies
of Boost in Guix, possibly using =E2=80=98guix refresh -l boost=E2=80=99.

Ludo=E2=80=99.