In addition to the cover letter. Oleg Pykhalov writes: > Hello Guix, > > Licensecheck attempts to determine the license that applies to each file > passed to it, by searching the start of the file for text belonging to various > licenses. > > > Some notes while I've adopted `guix import cpan` produced packages: > > - perl-b-hooks-op-check, perl-bareword-filehandles, perl-multidimensional had > a perl-gtk-perl in native-inputs. > > - perl-test-roo had a perl-bareword-filehandles in native-inputs. `guix lint` failed on perl-strictures-2 and didn't lint other packages I sended. Well, will know this in future. I have fixed following warning --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- gnu/packages/perl.scm:4313:14: perl-lexical-sealrequirehints@0.011: synopsis should start with an upper-case letter or digit gnu/packages/perl.scm:3972:14: perl-indirect@0.38: no period allowed at the end of the synopsis gnu/packages/perl.scm:369:17: perl-bareword-filehandles@0.005: description should start with an upper-case letter or digit gnu/packages/perl.scm:1883:14: perl-data-section@0.200007: synopsis should start with an upper-case letter or digit gnu/packages/perl.scm:9122:17: perl-pod-constants@0.19: sentences in description should be followed by two spaces; possible infraction at 218 --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- The following are new to me, so should I add a "v" in (version …) for those packages? I see for example perl-file-find-object has it. --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- /home/natsu/src/guix-wip-licensecheck/gnu/packages/license.scm:108:2: licensecheck@3.0.31: can be upgraded to v3.0.31 /home/natsu/src/guix-wip-licensecheck/gnu/packages/license.scm:33:2: perl-regexp-pattern-license@3.0.31: can be upgraded to v3.0.31 --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- [...] Oleg.