From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:49381)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1hPUCJ-0006MJ-4U
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 11 May 2019 11:46:03 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1hPUCI-0004eU-8d
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 11 May 2019 11:46:03 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:55539)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1hPUCH-0004eE-Sl
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 11 May 2019 11:46:02 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1hPUCH-000640-K0
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 11 May 2019 11:46:01 -0400
Subject: [bug#35661] [PATCH] doc: Fix typo.
In-Reply-To: <87imujpbph.fsf@GlaDOS.home>
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.35661.B35661.155758954523283@debbugs.gnu.org>
From: Diego Nicola Barbato <dnbarbato@posteo.de>
References: <87imujpbph.fsf@GlaDOS.home> <cu7o949a106.fsf@systemreboot.net>
Date: Sat, 11 May 2019 17:45:31 +0200
Message-ID: <87a7ft0zc4.fsf@GlaDOS.home>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
	<mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
	<mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: Arun Isaac <arunisaac@systemreboot.net>
Cc: 35661@debbugs.gnu.org

Arun Isaac <arunisaac@systemreboot.net> writes:

>> The documentation of 'shepherd-service' erroneously calls the
>> 'requirement' field 'requirements'.  The attached patch fixes that.
>
> Thanks! I added a copyright header for you and pushed the patch.

Thanks!  I was not aware that removing a single character would warrant
the addition of a copyright header.  I have made less trivial changes in
the past and I have never added a copyright line.  Should I do something
about that?