From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:46369)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1hRD6Z-0005Pc-RK
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 16 May 2019 05:55:16 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1hRD5O-0004i1-MN
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 16 May 2019 05:54:03 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:40754)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1hRD5O-0004h0-IE
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 16 May 2019 05:54:02 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1hRD5O-0007ky-En
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 16 May 2019 05:54:02 -0400
Subject: [bug#35736] geiser-edit-symbol-at-point (M-.) does not work on
	fork+exec-command
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.35736.B35736.155800043029797@debbugs.gnu.org>
From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
References: <cu7a7fo93vf.fsf@systemreboot.net> <87y337vql5.fsf@gnu.org>
	<cu74l5u98v7.fsf@systemreboot.net>
Date: Thu, 16 May 2019 11:53:40 +0200
In-Reply-To: <cu74l5u98v7.fsf@systemreboot.net> (Arun Isaac's message of "Thu,
	16 May 2019 12:36:04 +0530")
Message-ID: <87a7fmiv2z.fsf@gnu.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
	<mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
	<mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: Arun Isaac <arunisaac@systemreboot.net>
Cc: 35736@debbugs.gnu.org

Arun Isaac <arunisaac@systemreboot.net> skribis:

>> What about proposing this change to =E2=80=98scheme-mode=E2=80=99 to Ema=
cs upstream?
>>
>> Alternately, or in the meantime, we could carry that fix in Geiser
>> maybe?
>
> I don't think reporting this to scheme-mode or geiser would help. They
> are justified in classifying ?+ as a symbol constituent character
> (_). It is we (the Guix project) who have reclassified ?+ as an
> expression prefix character (') in a "non-standard" way for our use in
> gexps. WDYT?

Oh true, sorry!

Well I don=E2=80=99t know, I=E2=80=99m confused now.  I vaguely remember pr=
ior
discussions about this with Alex Kost, but I forgot what the conclusions
were.  :-/

Ludo=E2=80=99.