From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:45911) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hVGbb-0004Kb-1V for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 27 May 2019 10:28:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hVGba-0007KW-03 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 27 May 2019 10:28:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:40171) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hVGbZ-0007Jg-TN for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 27 May 2019 10:28:01 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hVGbZ-0005LM-P5 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 27 May 2019 10:28:01 -0400 Subject: [bug#35388] [PATCH] gnu: julia: Update to 1.1.0 Resent-Message-ID: From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= References: <0190423085235.21419-1-anothersms@gmail.com> <20190425075114.10284-1-anothersms@gmail.com> <87ftpsm0rk.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Mon, 27 May 2019 16:26:55 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87ftpsm0rk.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic \=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\= \=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Mon, 06 May 2019 10:43:11 +0200") Message-ID: <87a7f8ug5s.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: =?UTF-8?Q?Nicol=C3=B2?= Balzarotti Cc: 35388@debbugs.gnu.org Hi Nicol=C3=B2, Did you have a chance to look into it? Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99. Ludovic Court=C3=A8s skribis: > Hi Nicol=C3=B2, > > Nicol=C3=B2 Balzarotti skribis: > >> One second problem regards the llvm patches. They should be generic (as = stated >> in the link in the patch, [2]) but are actually needed to compile julia = (so I >> cannot use pure system llvm, but I don't feel like applying them to syst= em >> llvm all by myself). > > OK. > >> The .patch files are available in the julia source package: is it ok to = place them in the patches folder or shuld I fetch the julia source and extr= act them during build? > > It would be best if they could be downloaded from upstream. For that > you could use one =E2=80=98origin=E2=80=99 for each patch and use them di= rectly in the > =E2=80=98patches=E2=80=99 field. Alternately, if that=E2=80=99s more con= venient, you could add > one =E2=80=98origin=E2=80=99 for the whole repository, and add an =E2=80= =98apply-patches=E2=80=99 to the > =E2=80=98llvm-julia=E2=80=99 package that would pick patches in the right= place. > > Could you also try to provide a commit log listing all the changes that > this patch makes? You can read =E2=80=98git log=E2=80=99 for examples or= see > . > > Other than that I think it should be ready to go, and I=E2=80=99m really = happy a > newer Julia package is around the corner! > > Thank you, and apologies for the delay! > > Ludo=E2=80=99.